ShareThis Page
Therrien’s moves make sense |

Therrien’s moves make sense

| Monday, May 26, 2008 12:00 a.m


The act of a desperate man, overreacting to one measly loss?

Some will view it that way.

And they will be wrong.

Based on the forward combinations seen at Sunday’s practice, Penguins coach Michel Therrien apparently will revamp every line for Game 2 of the Stanley Cup final tonight.

The new combos:

• Ryan Malone-Sidney Crosby-Marian Hossa

• Maxime Talbot-Evgeni Malkin-Petr Sykora

• Pascal Dupuis-Jordan Staal-Tyler Kennedy

• Gary Roberts-Adam Hall-Jarkko Ruutu

Desperation is making sweeping changes when you’re down 3-0, the way the Flyers did. Therrien is being proactive, responding to an opponent that plays nothing like the Penguins’ previous three.

This is not the first time Therrien has been proactive in these playoffs. After sweeping Ottawa, he changed two of his defense pairs before Game 1 against New York.

“We have to make adjustments,” he said yesterday.

If I’m Therrien, I take the overhaul a bit further. I go back to the old defense pairings, which had an offensive presence on each, and alter the power play.

It really is time for the team’s best shooter – Malkin – to start shooting again, and that isn’t going to happen from the left point. Malkin is not comfortable there, for at least one obvious reason: He’s a left-handed shot, so his ability to unleash one-timers is nearly negated.

Malkin has only 10 shots (one goal) in the past five games. He has gone eight games without a power-play goal. Therrien and assistant coach Mike Yeo, who runs the power play, should put him back on the right side, preferably up front, around the circle, and use Ryan Whitney on the left point.

Doing so might give Malkin a confidence boost, which could extend to his even-strength game.

We’ve seen that sort of thing happen before.

When Alex Kovalev came to Pittsburgh, he refused to shoot and was a massive underachiever. Coach Kevin Constantine finally decided to put Kovalev on the right point on the power play and told him to fire away.

Kovalev never stopped. His confidence grew, and his career took off, providing evidence that how a player is used on the power play can extend to his overall game.

If the coaching staff insists on keeping Malkin at the left point, maybe Talbot’s speed can help jumpstart him at even-strength.

Therrien obviously saw in Game 1 what a lot of us saw: His team looked a step slow and was unable to convert glorious opportunities early on.

Malone, perhaps, can capitalize on some of the Crosby-generated chances that Dupuis struggled with.

Asked if he was upset about the change, Dupuis said, “Not at all. I’m all about winning.”

Roberts apparently will force Georges Laraque out of the lineup. Makes sense. The tempo of the series seems too fast for Laraque.

The Red Wings, of course, are so good that none of this might work. But I’d rather try to get ahead of the game then remain hopelessly behind it, the way the Penguins were for the latter two periods of Game 1.

Additional Information:

Line adjustments

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.