ShareThis Page
Thompson sets record, moves into quarters |

Thompson sets record, moves into quarters

The Associated Press
| Wednesday, October 9, 2002 12:00 a.m

SOUTHERN PINES, N.C. — Carol Semple Thompson broke, then extended a USGA record Tuesday in advancing to the quarterfinals of the Senior Women’s Amateur at Mid-Pines Inn and Golf Club.

Thompson, the three-time defending champion and this year’s medalist, has won a record 21 consecutive matches in one USGA event. The 53-year-old from Sewickley, Pa., beat Patty Lang, of Saegertown, Pa., 2 and 1 in the second round for her 20th consecutive win, breaking the record she shared for a day with Alexa Stirling and Glenna Collett Vare, who both set their marks in the Women’s Amateur.

Stirling won three consecutive titles in 1916 and 1919-20, while Vare won three in a row from 1928-30.

In the third round, two-time champion Marlene Streit, 68, of Canada took Thompson to the 18th hole but lost 2 down.

“I’m sort of thinking about my game more than setting any records,” Thompson said.

Streit cut the deficit to 1 down with a 20-foot birdie on 15. Thompson missed putts in the 5-foot range on the next two holes, but won the match when Streit, who won in 1985 and 1994, conceded after three-putting 18.

“Marlene is always a tough competitor,” Thompson. “It’s nice to get to the quarterfinal. It makes the trip worthwhile at the very least.”

In Wednesday’s quarterfinals Thompson faces 1997 champion Nancy Fitzgerald, of Carmel, Ind., who beat Alice Harcourt, of Fallbrook, Calif., 3 and 2 in the third round.

In other third-round matches, Anne Carr, of Renton, Wash., last year’s runnerup, beat Marianne Towersey, of Newport Beach, Calif., 2 and 1, and Barbara Berkmeyer, of St. Louis, beat Tish Preuss, of Colorado Springs, Colo., in 20 holes after losing a 4-up lead over the last six holes.

The semifinals and final are Thursday.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.