RICHMOND, Va. (AP) — Nearly a week after Hurricane Isabel muscled its way ashore, thousands of East Coast residents were still without power — their troubles compounded by a second round of storms.
At least 40,000 customers lost power in Virginia, some for the second time in a week, when tornadoes touched down in the Richmond area Tuesday, part of a weather system that also caused damage in Maryland, Delaware, New Jersey and Pennsylvania.
As of Wednesday evening, about 440,000 customers in Virginia and North Carolina were still without power, and volunteers continued to make the rounds with food and water.
“There are pockets of indigent people, pockets of elderly people who can’t really get around,” said Heather Livingston, executive director of the Hampton Roads, Va., chapter of the Red Cross.
She said volunteers are “frustrated. We’re all tired. We’re doing the best we can.”
No serious injuries were reported from the latest round of storms. Isabel has been blamed for at least 40 deaths, 25 of them in Virginia.
Yesterday, Virginia Gov. Mark R. Warner surveyed hurricane-ravaged counties and briefly helped volunteers in Smithfield hand out hot meals to residents lined up for free food, ice and water.
Officials said it would cost at least $625 million to fix Isabel’s damage in Virginia alone.
Tuesday’s violent weather in Maryland added 50,000 customers without power to the more than 131,000 still in the dark since Isabel, utility officials said.
Thousands more lost power in New Jersey and Pennsylvania, but nearly all had it restored by late yesterday.
John Thomas was at his home in Narberth, Pa., Tuesday when a tornado touched down nearby.
“I thought I was going to take off like Dorothy in ‘The Wizard of Oz,”‘ said the 69-year-old Thomas. “I have a big tree out front and it was bending and I thought, ‘Wow, that baby’s gone.”‘
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.