ShareThis Page
Thrashers moving to Winnipeg next season |

Thrashers moving to Winnipeg next season

The Associated Press
| Tuesday, May 31, 2011 12:00 a.m

WINNIPEG, Manitoba — The Atlanta Thrashers are moving to Winnipeg.

True North Sports and Entertainment announced Tuesday at Winnipeg’s MTS Centre that it has purchased the struggling team and will shift it to Canada next season.

The deal is reportedly worth $170 million, including a $60 million relocation fee that would be split by the rest of the league.

Winnipeg has been without NHL hockey since the Jets moved to Phoenix in 1996. The Thrashers entered the league three years later as an expansion franchise, but ownership problems, a losing team and dwindling attendance doomed the club.

The team ranked 28th out of 30 teams this year with an average attendance of less than 14,000.

The deal still must be approved by the board of governors, which meets June 21, but that shouldn’t be a stumbling block.

“I’m excited beyond words to announce the purchase of the Atlanta Thrashers,” Mark Chipman, chairman of the board of True North, said during a news conference.

Assuming the deal goes through, Atlanta would become the first city in the NHL’s modern era to lose two teams. The Flames moved to Calgary in 1980 after eight seasons in Atlanta.

The deal was completed early Tuesday.

“It’s nice to be back in Winnipeg after all these years,” said NHL Commissioner Gary Bettman, who attended the news conference.

True North made its announcement one day before the start of the Stanley Cup final, which begins Wednesday in Vancouver between the Canucks and the Boston Bruins. While there was no prohibition on announcing major news during that series, the league preferred to get the Thrashers’ sale off its plate before opening its signature event.

For weeks, the two sides had been working through complex legal details on the sale and relocation of the team, while leaving open the possibility that a local buyer would emerge late in the process. No one ever came forward with a serious offer, according to the Thrashers’ ownership group, Atlanta Spirit, and the city’s mayor, Kasim Reed.

“It is going to hurt the city but we will withstand it just fine and we will get through it,” Reed said.

Bettman said the league didn’t want to leave Atlanta but had little choice.

“No real local purchasers emerged,” he said. “When the Atlanta ownership made it clear they wanted out, we reached outside the Atlanta market.”

Team president Don Waddell had said there remains some hope for a late development until a sale is made official and approved by the NHL board of governors.

But considering Atlanta Spirit, which also owns the NBA’s Atlanta Hawks and the operating rights to Philips Arena, has been trying for years to sell the hockey team, that seems highly unlikely.

Also, any potential owner would have to agree to become a tenant at Philips Arena, a major impediment because it would cut into potential revenue from sources such as concessions, parking, luxury suites and other events.

“We don’t like to move a franchise,” Bettman said. “We’re not happy about leaving Atlanta. This was never about whether Winnipeg is better than Atlanta. The decision to come to Winnipeg was only made after the Atlanta ownership made the decision they were going to sell even if it meant the team was going to leave Atlanta.”

Additional Information:

On the move

The most recent franchises to relocate in the four major professional sports leagues:


1997: Houston Oilers to Tennessee


2005: Montreal Expos to Washington, D.C.


2008: Seattle SuperSonics to Oklahoma City


2011: Atlanta Thrashers to Winnipeg


Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.