ShareThis Page
Three generations at home is company |

Three generations at home is company

Sharing a home with her parents has financial benefits, but the main advantages for Nancy Snider are intangible: higher quality of life and the knowledge that her bedridden father, Robert Cochrane, is receiving good care.

“We didn’t think it all the way through. It just sort of evolved,” said Snider, 61, of McCandless.

Her brother, Duncan, and her daughter, Jayla, 7, also live in the home.

About 5 million households in Pennsylvania had three or more generations living under the same roof in 2010, according to Census Bureau figures released today. That’s a 5 percent increase from 2000.

Nationally, the state ranked 27th in percentage of multigenerational households at 3.1 percent of total households in 2000. The rate was 3.5 percent in 2010, though a 2010 national ranking isn’t yet available. The Census Bureau has released figures for seven states, including Pennsylvania, and plans to release data for the other states over the next month.

The 2010 Census found 16,215 multigenerational households in Allegheny, Armstrong, Beaver, Butler, Fayette, Greene, Indiana, Lawrence, Washington and Westmoreland counties, giving Western Pennsylvania a rate of 2.5 percent. It is unclear if that is a change, because the 2000 Census didn’t provide comparable numbers.

Snider, an agent for Coldwell Banker, said she handles more people seeking homes that can house their parents as well as their children. National studies have pointed to families combining households to save money, but the people Snider talks with are more concerned about keeping their loved ones out of nursing homes, she said.

“I think it’s more for the care of them than it is financial reasons,” she said.

Deborah Kane, an agent with Howard Hanna Real Estate, said tight finances can lead to extended families sharing a home, creating a growing demand for housing that can accommodate multiple generations.

One of her clients, a family with three generations, is living in one house while one parent looks for a new job, Kane said. Another client decided to sell her home and move her family into her mother’s house because it would be easier to care for her mother, she said.

Jeff Passel, a senior demographer with the Pew Hispanic Center, which released a report on the trend last year, said households become multigenerational for several reasons. In 2000, the main trend was adult children moving in with their parents, not the other way around.

“I wish we knew more about the actual dynamics involved,” he said.

Marilyn Cochrane, Snider’s mother, said the arrangement works well for all of them. Snider can look after her father if her mother needs to go somewhere. And if Snider needs to go somewhere, her mother can watch Jayla.

“We tag-team a lot,” Cochrane said.

Cochrane, a former real estate agent from Indianapolis, said homes with extra rooms for parents weren’t a big seller when she retired about five years ago, but she’s not surprised they are a hot commodity in the Pittsburgh area.

“I think this is a very family-oriented area. The families are closer,” she said.

Snider said an increasing number of people seem to be looking for homes with an “in-law suite,” or a separate apartment with a kitchen.

“That’s a big seller. If a house has an in-law suite, it goes real fast,” she said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.