Archive

ShareThis Page
Three jailed on drug charges in Kittanning | TribLIVE.com
News

Three jailed on drug charges in Kittanning

Jamie Rankin
| Saturday, April 5, 2014 12:31 a.m
LTRemaley
Ashley Remaley
LTJustinSmith
Justin Smith
LTHeigley
Sara Elizabeth Heigley

Two women were charged this week with selling heroin to Armstrong County Narcotics Enforcement Team informants in Kittanning.

Sara Elizabeth Heigley, 26, of Spruce Street, Natrona, is accused of selling 10 stamp bags of heroin for $100 at Woodward and Union avenues on March 14. She is charged with felony counts of possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver, delivery of a controlled substance and criminal use of a cellphone, and misdemeanor counts of possession of drug paraphernalia and possession of a controlled substance.

Ashley Remaley, 30, of Market Street, Kittanning, is accused of selling six stamp bags of heroin for $90 in the alley between Orr and Wilson avenues on March 24, and another six bags in the parking lot of ARC Manor, a rehabilitation facility on Oak Street in Kittanning two days later.

Remaley is charged with two felony counts of possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver, delivery of a controlled substance and criminal use of a cellphone, and two misdemeanor counts of of possession of a controlled substance and possession of drug paraphernalia.

Police also charged Justin W. Smith, 30, of Reesdale Road, Adrian, with a felony count of criminal conspiracy for delivering a controlled substance when he accompanied Remaley to the sale at ARC Manor.

District Judge James Owen committed Remaley and Smith to the Armstrong County Jail on Wednesday in lieu of $25,000 bond each. Heigley was jailed on Friday, with bail set at $25,000.

Brad Pedersen is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-543-1303, ext. 1337, or bpedersen@tribweb.com.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.