Tim Benz: Slow draft week doesn’t mean Penguins will remain silent |

Tim Benz: Slow draft week doesn’t mean Penguins will remain silent

Tim Benz
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Phil Kessel remained with the Penguins through the NHL Draft. The team didn't make any trades over the weekend, but columnist Tim Benz says that doesn't mean there aren't moves forthcoming.

If you were looking for a big splash from the Pirates offense over the weekend, you didn’t get it .

That’s not surprising.

What was surprising this weekend was a similar lack of fireworks from the Penguins at the NHL Draft.

They didn’t make any trades of note to move up into the first round, to trim salary cap space or to acquire potential talent for the 2018-19 roster .

Notoriously creative general manager Jim Rutherford frequently makes moves at points on the calendar when many deals are consummated. He tweaks his roster whenever he sees the need for improvement, even after a year that ended with a Stanley Cup.

Like last year, when the Pens acquired Ryan Reaves at the draft.

Rutherford warned us in advance that this might not be a very active offseason , even though 2018 stopped two rounds earlier than the previous two campaigns. But he also said the roster would look different.

Having the draft come and go with no moves doesn’t eliminate that possibility. There is still plenty of time between now and the start of the season. However, the main reason why the draft seemed like such an obvious place to start pushing the dominoes is it provided an opportunity for the Penguins to achieve two major goals:

1) make a prospect pipeline thinned by many “win now” trades deeper by acquiring draft picks. And …

2) acquire those picks by shedding salary from a roster that is going to be pushing the cap.

Rutherford still can accomplish these tasks. For instance, a player such as Conor Sheary or Derick Brassard could be traded. The return might not be as good now, though, and the draft picks will be another 12 months away from becoming Penguins property.

One thing that does seem highly unlikely at this point is a trade of Phil Kessel. As predicted here Friday , the Penguins didn’t sell off their talented right wing while in Dallas.

Perhaps that’s because — as reported by multiple outlets — Arizona wasn’t willing to take on Kessel’s contract, whatever Los Angeles was offering wasn’t enough and Rutherford simply couldn’t come to grips with the idea of trading away 92 points from a team that remains positioned to compete for a title.

Unlike potential trades of other Penguins between now and training camp, the Kessel talk seems dead.

Consider coach Mike Sullivan’s “nothing-to-see-here” dissertation at the draft when asked about his allegedly tense relationship with Kessel. Sullivan never would’ve answered those questions to the degree that he did — and with the dismissive tone that he had — if there was any chance of the Penguins trading Kessel before the team reconvenes in the fall. It would look awfully strange for Sullivan to make statements like that in late June only to see No. 81 dealt once free agency starts July 1.

That’s also probably why we haven’t heard from Sullivan until now. Organizationally, the Penguins are always cognizant of trying to control the message and quelling stories that might have the slightest whiff of negativity.

Reports of a potential Kessel trade first cropped up right before Memorial Day weekend . TSN’s Bob McKenzie noted Los Angeles as a potential destination as early as June 4 .

So that’s about a month’s worth of time when Sullivan could have quashed discussion of a disconnect between himself and Kessel if such a problem was truly as imagined as Sullivan tried to make it sound Friday night.

Again, he could have. Unless, of course, he was waiting to see if Rutherford was going to make a trade before the draft was over.

Which makes a lot more sense to me.

So that’s $6.8 million against the cap the Penguins won’t be moving. Therefore, Penguins fans who want Carolina forward Jeff Skinner might have to witness a couple of other players getting pushed off the roster to make that happen. Skinner is going to make $5.75 million this year.

Rutherford always has been described accurately as aggressive. But that doesn’t mean he’s impatient. He waited for Matt Cullen after 2016, took his time before landing Riley Sheahan and stuck with the ups and downs of players such as Sheary, Carl Hagelin, and Olli Maatta.

His inactivity at the draft might seem odd. Yet it might be just a delayed start before a flurry of moves.

Moves that might be more complex to pull off now but still are possible.

Tim Benz is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at [email protected] or via Twitter @TimBenzPGH.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.