ShareThis Page
Time to stop profiteering |

Time to stop profiteering

Let’s see if I can get this straight: Social Security recipients will get a 1.7 percent increase for 2015 — about $20 per month. But Highmark is raising its rates, the price of pharmaceuticals is going up and hospitals are increasing rates.

The CEOs make millions while senior citizens risk losing everything: home, food, medicine, etc. You can’t get politicians or anyone else to help you.

What is the going price to kill off seniors? If you go to a pharmacy to get medicine instead of through mail order, you’re charged a higher price. Prices should be the same everywhere.

Highmark is a nonprofit outfit. Seven million dollars for its CEO is not my idea of nonprofit.

Highmark and the rest found out how to make more money and the politicians let them. They changed laws to let them. The old laws stopped this kind of stuff.

People don’t read the paper because it doesn’t tell truthfully what is going on. Things are hidden in the back of the paper and what Harrisburg is doing doesn’t get printed.

It’s time for the people to stand up and take back this state and country. By the 2020s or 2030s, we’ll all be back on the soup lines. No one will have anything, thanks to the politicians.

Edward Graham

Natrona Heights

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.