ShareThis Page
Title on the line for Monessen |

Title on the line for Monessen

| Thursday, October 25, 2001 12:00 a.m

MONESSEN – There is an old adage that goes “the more things change, the more they stay the same.”

Nothing could be truer for Friday’s collision in Carmichaels.

Monessen (8-0, 7-0) will take on the Mikes (7-1, 6-1) with the Tri-County South title on the line.

“This is a big game, no question,” said first-year Monessen coach Joe Fischer. “It should be a good battle. Carmichaels plays the type of football that we will see in the playoffs, so we should be more comfortable with it. But we have to play this game first.”

“This will be a tough game,” said Carmichaels coach John Menhart. “Monessen is head and shoulders above everyone else in the conference. I have always respected Monessen, and coach Fischer has done a great job. He runs a class operation.”

This year’s game eerily resembles last year’s contest at Monessen’s Memorial Stadium, just with a different twist.

Going into tomorrow night’s contest, the visiting Hounds are undefeated and have the number one ranked scoring defense in the entire WPIAL. For the season, the Hounds defense has yielded only 27 points while posting four shutouts.

Last year, it was Carmichaels who came to Monessen undefeated with the top-ranked scoring defense in the WPIAL. The Mikes had allowed only 20 points.

A year ago, Monessen’s lone setback prior to the showdown was a two-point defeat (20-18) at Mapletown. This season the Mikes’ loss was a two-pointer (15-13) at Mapletown in the season opener.

As it was with Carmichaels last year, the visiting Hounds can clinch sole possession of the Tri-County South title with a win. The loss would put Carmichaels into the third- place spot going into the playoffs.

But if the Mikes win, then they will force a tie with the Hounds for the conference title. Toss into that a possible Mapletown win at California and there could be a three-way tie for first place.

If the Mikes win and the Maples lose, then the Mikes would get the first-place seed in the playoffs, leaving the Hounds with the second-place seed.

The key ingredient in Friday night’s game could be which team can play to their strength. The Hounds will feature incredible speed while the Mikes will counter with size up front in the battle of the trenches.

“We are going to go with what brought us to the dance,” said Fischer of his team’s speed. “Our speed is our strength, and we will try to take advantage of it.”

Menhart knows all about Monessen’s speed.

“They are very quick,” said Menhart. “Our kids will have to adjust to their speed, if we can adjust. But we have fast kids, too.”

Both Monessen and Carmichaels use a balanced attack on the ground. The Hounds have rushed for 2,346 yards on 226 carries for an average of 8.7 yards per carry. Freshman Quinton Martin leads the Hounds with 537 yards on 62 carries.

Carmichaels is led by Justin Mattei, Coby Giles and Bobby Hathaway on the ground. They have combined for 2,201 yards. For the year, the Mikes have rushed for more than 2,700 yards.

Fischer made note of the Mikes’ offensive line.

“The battle up front will be a big challenge for our linemen,” said Fischer. “I am really excited to see how our line plays.”

Carmichaels heads into the game without losing at home since 1997. Their opponent that night• Monessen.

The numerous story lines for this game have been laid out. The conference title is on the line. Home field advantage in the first round is also on the line. This game has all the makings of a great sequel to last year’s classic.

All that is left for the Hounds and Mikes to do is settle it on the field.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.