ShareThis Page
To helping hands in hospitals: Wash ’em! |

To helping hands in hospitals: Wash ’em!

Luis Fábregas
| Saturday, February 25, 2012 12:00 a.m

Admit it — you cringe every time you see someone walk out of a public rest room without washing their hands. It happens everywhere, especially at sports venues such as Heinz Field and PNC Park, according to one study.

Most of the time we crack a joke about it, hoping the culprit won’t be handing over our beer at the concession stand. But when it comes to handwashing in hospitals, that’s where we should draw the line.

Sadly, our hospitals are filled with dirty hands. They belong to physicians, nurses, hundreds of other employees and visitors. They are the hands that touch our loved ones and pass on potentially deadly germs.

Dirty hands are the top reason why hospital-acquired infections remain a huge problem in hospitals. On Friday, the Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council reported that more than 21,000 people contracted at least one hospital infection in 2010. Although that’s a tiny fraction of the 1.8 million patients admitted to hospitals every year, those 21,000 people are sons and daughters, mothers and fathers, grandmas and grandpas.

Hospitals in the past several years have tried their best to address the problem. You can’t get past the lobby at UPMC Presbyterian without seeing a waist-high dispenser of white foam that promises to kill off the pesky germs. You see dispensers in the cafeteria, waiting rooms and patient rooms.

Their mere presence doesn’t mean the machines are used. Over the years, I’ve heard from readers complaining of health care workers who won’t get near hand sanitizers. I’ve seen it myself, once confronting a head nurse at Children’s Hospital who walked into a patient room without washing her hands.

Some hospitals in America, including Miami Children’s Hospital, have resorted to policing workers with special sensors that track hand washing. If they approach a patient’s bed without hand washing, their name badge starts buzzing. An alert also goes to the worker’s supervisor.

The cost of caring for patients who pick up infections is high: Medicare pays about $21,378 for a patient with an infection, compared to $6,709 for a patient without one. In Miami, savings in infection-related care have paid for the sensors four times over, said Barb Simmonds, the hospital’s chief of infection control and prevention.

She hasn’t ruled out punishing workers who don’t wash their hands.

The sensors have not only reduced infection rates, they’ve cut down on the supply of available excuses from workers, Simmonds said.

“I washed my hands, you just didn’t see me,” used to be a common one, Simmonds said.

We’re not quite that advanced here in Pittsburgh. At best, most hospitals resort to sporadic monitoring. At St. Clair Hospital in Mt. Lebanon, the equivalent of a mystery shopper roams clinical areas once a month, peeking into rooms to see if those hands are being properly cleaned. Other hospitals do the same.

Hospitals often claim these efforts are effective, but the health care council numbers tell another story. Hospital workers need to get more serious about hand washing.

Even my kids know when to wash their hands.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.