ShareThis Page
Tour winner denies doping |

Tour winner denies doping

The Associated Press
| Saturday, October 2, 2010 12:00 a.m

MADRID — Three-time Tour de France winner Alberto Contador denies that his positive test for a banned drug stems from blood doping rather than contaminated steak, his spokesman said Friday.

The French sports daily L’Equipe reported yesterday that the German lab that found a tiny amount of the banned drug clenbuterol in Contador’s urine sample also found plastic residues of the kind that might turn up after a transfusion of blood from a plastic bag.

German television station ARD also reported that plastic traces were detected.

Contador spokesman Jacinto Vidarte told The Associated Press the Spanish rider “categorically denies having a blood transfusion.”

“There is nothing to that,” he said. “It is a science fiction story.”

Vidarte said no one at the International Cycling Union, which announced Contador’s positive test Thursday and his temporary suspension, has told Contador that plastic residues were found.

Vidarte said the World Anti-Doping Agency has not validated a method for detecting plastic from blood transfusion bags.

WADA director general David Howman, however, told the AP that a method was “fully validated and has been used in the food industry for years.”

“Its use for anti-doping purposes is partially validated and evidence from it, among others, can be used before tribunals,” Howman said.

The detection method has been developed by the WADA-accredited lab in Barcelona.

Douwe de Boer, a Dutch anti-doping expert hired by Contador to analyze his positive test result, has seen the report compiled by the German lab in Cologne and saw no mention of plastic residues, Vidarte said.

Contador on Thursday denied using clenbuterol and said the trace elements found in his urine came from beef he ate during this year’s Tour — once on July 20 and again on a rest day July 21, the day the drug was found in his urine.

If Contador is found guilty of doping, he faces the loss of his Tour de France title and a possible two-year ban.

Professor Michel Audran, a leading expert in blood doping, told the AP that the Barcelona lab published a study last year showing that the amount of plastic traces in people receiving a blood transfusion is twice as big as those found in the general population’s samples.

“If we find a high amount of plastic traces in Contador’s samples, the blood transfusion can’t be ruled out,” he said.

UCI president Pat McQuaid refused to comment on specifics of the Contador case yesterday.

“It’s an independent process,” he told the AP in Australia, where he is attending the world road racing championships. “The UCI are working closely with WADA, and we wait until we get to the process.”

Contador’s former team, Astana, issued a statement saying it supports the UCI’s decision to provisionally suspend the rider and is “now expecting further explanations from Alberto Contador.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.