Town hall meeting to review traffic flow changes in Kittanning |

Town hall meeting to review traffic flow changes in Kittanning

Kittanning council will host a town hall meeting to get input from residents about whether they support opening Jefferson Street to two-way traffic.

The proposed change would be made when the borough starts the second phase of its Downtown Impact project, council President Randy Cloak said.

A traffic study commissioned by the borough a year ago recommended opening Jefferson and McKean streets to two-way traffic. The borough is moving to make such a change on McKean Street, but Cloak said new members of council wanted to get public input before making the change on Jefferson Street.

“We just want to make sure that what we plan to do is what residents and business owners want,” Cloak said.

The town hall meeting is 7 p.m. Nov. 18 in the Church of God on Woodward Avenue in Kittanning. The meeting will review the proposed changes and open the floor for comments.

“We would like more input from the folks that are going to be directly affected by this,” Cloak said.

Council will seek input also on a change from parallel to diagonal parking that is being considered for Market Street.

Similar public hearings were held after the release of the traffic study, said Jennifer Bellas, director of the Armstrong County Community Development Office.

Borough engineer Senate Engineering is working on plans for phase two of the Downtown Impact project, which was recently awarded a $3 million state grant. The first phase that includes street paving and other improvements downtown is nearing completion.

“Council just wants to affirm or get additional opinions before phase two begins,” Bellas said. “If people have an opinion on it and they didn’t voice their opinion the first time we had the meetings, they can voice it now.”

Julie E. Martin is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-543-1303, ext. 1315 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.