Treat Internet content equally, Obama says |

Treat Internet content equally, Obama says

President Obama’s call for net neutrality could drive the Federal Communications Commission to regulate broadband service like a utility as a way to protect consumers’ ability to access all content without a threat of connectivity being throttled.

The FCC is an independent agency that will establish its own rules. But Obama’s public prodding could push the agency to adopt regulations that will allow greater oversight of Internet service providers.

Obama walked into the fray Monday, seeking more clarity on the hot-button issue. His unequivocal support for “net neutrality” — the notion that all content should be treated equally by Internet providers — could add fervor to a fight that has gone on for years.

“We cannot allow Internet service providers (ISPs) to restrict the best access or to pick winners and losers in the online marketplace for services and ideas,” Obama said in a statement. “I believe the FCC should create a new set of rules protecting net neutrality and ensuring that neither the cable company nor the phone company will be able to act as a gatekeeper, restricting what you can do or see online.”

Specifically, Obama called for prohibiting ISPs from blocking or deliberately slowing any legal content. His proposals include a recommendation to mostly ban paid-for “fast-lane” access, in which a content provider refusing to pay extra would be subject to slower Internet transmission.

His support for the FCC to reclassify consumer broadband Internet service and regulate it as if it’s a utility — like electricity and water — rallied many consumer advocacy groups that have asked for a similar strategy to protect unfettered access. The reclassification would give the FCC “much greater authority to address consumer problems,” said John Bergmayer, an attorney at technology policy advocacy group Public Knowledge. “It’s a source of authority that the FCC can draw on for many broadband problems.”

“This is the critical infrastructure of our 21st century,” said Michael Copps, a former FCC commissioner and special adviser to Common Cause. “This is how we communicate with each other. This is our news and our information, our journalism, our innovation and entrepreneurship. This really demonstrates that the president understands how important this issue is.”

However, industry groups that represent ISPs criticized the plan.

“Such a move would set the industry back decades, and threaten the private sector investment that is critically needed to ensure that the network can meet surging demand,” the Telecommunications Industry Association said in a statement.

Sen. Ted Cruz, R- Texas, took to Twitter to compare the plan with Obamacare, saying that “the Internet should not operate at the speed of government.”

The FCC has been recasting new net neutrality rules because the previous set was tossed out by a federal court in January. The court agreed that the agency could regulate the Internet but must enact rules that establish its authority. The agency got nearly 4 million responses during its public comment period on potential rules.

While the FCC had been expected to vote on new rules by the end of the year, that is unlikely.

“The more deeply we examined the issues around the various legal options, the more it has become plain that there is more work to do,” FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler said in response to the president’s statement.

Net neutrality supporters have criticized early drafts of the rules, saying they could allow ISPs to establish “fast lanes” that would cost consumers more. Meanwhile, ISPs have told the FCC that they would abide by open Internet rules, to not prioritize certain content, without such a utility-based regulatory approach.

Shares of ISPs fell Monday morning.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.