ShareThis Page
Tree-shopping with Dad |

Tree-shopping with Dad

| Saturday, December 1, 2012 9:01 p.m

It was one of my favorite rituals every year.

One evening after dinner — a few weeks after Thanksgiving — my father and I would shop for a Christmas tree.

My father wore his rattiest coat as he prepared to do battle with strangers who would attempt to part him from precious family resources.

He instructed me to remain silent as he executed his negotiation strategy — one he’d refined and perfected over the years — for good reason.

When I was 7 and he was on the hunt for my first bicycle, he’d found a beauty by accident. As he worked his cunning on the unsuspecting flea-market guy, I raved about the bike — how I couldn’t wait to get it home!

I screwed up the deal royally, of course, and my dad was steamed. The flea-market guy wouldn’t budge off the price and we walked away bikeless.

Over the next few years, I learned to keep my yap shut when my father displayed his cunning.

As the cold December air froze our bones — as a hot fire raged in an old steel barrel to keep the tree-lot guys warm — my father would almost go into a trance.

We’d hit no fewer than four Christmas tree lots every year — among Kiwanis Club, Knights of Columbus, VFW, Elks Club and American Legion lots.

We’d search high and low, pulling out a variety of trees and assessing them. When we found a real beauty at each lot, we’d set it aside.

Then my father would shift into high gear.

“That’s a sweet tree you found there, mister,” one tree-lot guy would eventually say. “Want me to ring you up?”

“You call this a Douglas Fir,” my dad would say, as though he’d earned a doctorate in horticulture. “This tree is dry and weak and will probably burn my house down!”

It’d take 90 minutes or more, but my father would soon pit the Kiwanis Club guy against the Knights of Columbus guy, the Elks Club guy against the VFW guy, then the American Legion guy against all of them.

He’d pound them so hard on the poor quality of their product that one would soon break, giving my father a massive discount so long as he’d leave the lot as soon as possible.

I had no idea at the time, but my father taught me many valuable lessons — lessons he’d wished his father, who died when my dad was only 3, had been able to teach him.

In the most basic sense, he taught me the value of money — how hard it is to earn and how much harder it is to save.

He taught me that strangers don’t generally care about my interests so much as they do their own — that, like it or not, you have to hold your ground against people who likely don’t care a whit about what is best for you.

He taught me how much he loved his family and put their needs before his own. He didn’t enjoy fighting with strangers to save every dollar, but he knew that money was needed to provide for his children. From the day he and my mother married as young people in the 1950s, they had to pinch every penny and still do — woe to anyone who tried to take food out of the mouths of their children.

If I could make one Christmas wish this year — a year in which more than 40 percent of children in the U.S. are born to single mothers — it would be that all children would be blessed with a father like mine and would spend these next few weeks shopping for Christmas trees with their dads.

Tom Purcell, a freelance writer, lives in Library. Visit him on the web at E-mail him at:

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.