ShareThis Page
Trial starts in Allegheny court reporter’s slaying |

Trial starts in Allegheny court reporter’s slaying

Bobby Kerlik
| Monday, October 20, 2008 12:00 p.m

The lawyer for a North Side man accused of shooting a popular Allegheny County court reporter admitted his client fired the shots but said he did so while defending himself from a group of men that were shooting at him.

Defense attorney Noah Geary told the jury in opening statements this morning that his client, Jayquon Massey, 19, was not aiming for Cheryl Wilds when he fired Nov. 21 at a group of men in a red sport utility vehicle in the North Side. Geary said Massey was being stalked by the men and was handed a gun by Wilds’ son, Robert Wilds, who lived near the shooting. Robert Wilds and Massey are cousins.

The courtroom was packed with several members of the courthouse staff, including court reporters who were friends with Wilds. Visiting Common Pleas Judge John K. Reilly of Clearfield County is presiding over the case and a freelance court reporter is handling the stenography.

Wilds, 47, was shot in the neck while she carried her Thanksgiving groceries home. She died Feb. 27 from her injuries.

Wilds was Massey’s great aunt.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.