Archive

ShareThis Page
Trib had warned of terror threat by French brother in 2005 story | TribLIVE.com
News

Trib had warned of terror threat by French brother in 2005 story

Par8068189
AFP/Getty Images
This image obtained by AFP from a French police source shows a reproduction of the ID card of Said Kouachi found in the car left by the two suspects of the Islamist attack the day before that killed 12 people at Charlie Hebdo's editorial office in Paris. Cherif Kouachi, the 32-year-old hunted along with his older brother Said is a jihadist who has been well-known to anti-terror police for many years.
461178194
Getty Images
Pictured in this handout provided by the Direction centrale de la Police judiciaire on Thursday, Jan. 8, 2015, is suspect Cherif Kouachi, aged 32, who is wanted in connection with an attack at the satirical weekly Charlie Hebdo. Twelve people were killed yesterday as two gunmen opened fire at the offices of the French satirical publication on Wednesday, Jan. 7, 2015.
Hkg10134562
AFP/Getty Images
This handout photo released by French Police in Paris early on January 8, 2015 shows Said Kouachi, aged 34, a suspect wanted in connection with an attack at a satirical weekly in the French capital that killed at least 12 people. French police on January 8 published photos of Said Kouachi and his brother, wanted as suspects over the bloody massacre at the magazine in Paris, as they launched an appeal to the public for information. AFP PHOTO / FRENCH POLICE -- EDITORS NOTE --- RESTRICTED TO EDITORIAL USE -- MANDATORY CREDIT 'AFP PHOTO / FRENCH POLICE' NO MARKETING - NO ADVERTISING CAMPAIGNS -- DISTRIBUTED AS A SERVICE TO CLIENTSFRENCH POLICE/AFP/Getty Images
461137458
Getty Images
PARIS, FRANCE - JANUARY 07: Pens are thrown on the ground as people hold a vigil at the Place de la Republique (Republic Square) for victims of the terrorist attack, on January 7, 2015 in Paris, France. Twelve people were killed, including two police officers, after gunmen opened fire at the offices of the French satirical publication Charlie Hebdo. (Photo by Dan Kitwood/Getty Images)

One of the brothers sought in the violent attack at a French satire magazine Wednesday had radicalized a decade ago, the Tribune-Review warned in a story from 2005 .

Cherif Kouachi had been heading to Iraq to take up jihad against American and Iraqi soldiers when French police arrested him and two others, the newspaper reported. Yet Kouachi had been leading a personal life that was in conflict with his intentions — and with the murderous acts he’s accused of committing this week, his lawyer said.

Kouachi drank, smoked pot, slept with his girlfriend and delivered pizzas for a living, his lawyer at the time, Vincent Ollivier, told the Trib. Kouachi’s parents, Algerian immigrants, had died, and he was looking to an Islamist recruiter for guidance.

“He found someone who could tell him what to do,” Ollivier said then, “like an older brother.”

Today Kouachi, 32, and his older brother, Said, 34, are wanted for killing a dozen people Wednesday in a brazen attack on the Paris offices of Charlie Hebdo, a satirical magazine that had been critical of Islam and recently published cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad and the head of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria, or ISIS.

Mark Houser, a former investigative reporter for the Trib, said he learned about Kouachi while working on a larger story about radical Muslims across Europe. Even at the time, Houser said he doubted whether the lawyer was being sincere — or if he was simply defending his client — when he said Kouachi had second thoughts about going to Iraq and had indicated he may have been glad he had been arrested.

“I’m not very surprised,” Houser said Thursday about Kouachi’s alleged role in the attacks. “I didn’t believe his attorney. I don’t know if his attorney even believed that (Kouachi) was not really dangerous. I think it’s really upsetting and tragic that someone of his potential danger, and who was as clearly interested in jihad as he was, remained at large.”

Kouachi had been arrested in January 2005 as he attempted to travel to Syria and then sneak across the border into Iraq, where he planned to fight against American and Iraqi troops. Three years later, he appeared in court wearing a track suit and sneakers, according to a report in the French daily Le Monde.

He and three other defendants faced up to 10 years in prison, but a judge sentenced Kouachi to three years, with an 18-month suspended sentence and credit for time served, according to media reports. He was released immediately.

The Trib reported at the time that terrorism defendants had fewer rights in France than in the United States — with tougher interrogation and admissible evidence rules — but their sentences tended to be much more lenient, usually maxing out at 10 years.

Once he got out of prison, Kouachi apparently resumed his radical activities. USA Today said he and his brother returned to France last summer from fighting in Syria, where Islamic State fighters are attempting to establish a government. It’s not clear whether the brothers had gone there as fighters or, if so, what rebel group they had joined, an expert told the Trib.

European governments have struggled to fight terrorism while upholding the strict rule of law, said Michael Kenney, a University of Pittsburgh professor who recently returned from London, where he met with the former members of a banned group of Islamic activists.

Europe has a very active Islamic scene with radical groups holding protests, staging rallies and setting up preaching stalls on the street, he said. Their language might be provocative at times, but without breaking the law.

“It’s been a major challenge for the British government, the French government and the German government,” Kenney said. “These are all vibrant, liberal democracies that try hard to protect their individual citizens’ political rights and civil liberties while also balancing the protection of those rights against the safety of society.”

Democracies can have a harder time fighting terrorism because of their openness, but they keep down violence by allowing people to freely express ideas, said James Piazza, a Penn State University professor who studies terrorism and radical Islam.

“In a free society, there are limits to what the police can do,” Piazza said. “But (democracies) also provide an important safety valve that allows people to express a range of ideas that are not violent. … They are better at respecting certain rights that redirect the radical effect.”

Kouachi’s lawyer in 2005 said his client had told other militants that they should attack Jewish interests in France, but Ollivier dismissed such talk as Kouachi’s only putting up a front to look brave.

Kouachi was among a group of radical Muslims who lived in Paris’ 19th arrondissement, a residential district crowded with North African immigrants and their descendants, along with native French. Investigators identified the drab, concrete Addawa mosque on the narrow Rue de Tanger as the place where a jihad recruiter met with Kouachi and other young Muslims and persuaded them to sneak into Iraq.

Houser, who works at Robert Morris University as university editor and an adjunct professor of communication, said he was drawn to the subject because of the challenges Western governments face in fighting terrorism and radical Muslims.

“In many of my interviews, officials clearly understood the danger and knew who some of the potentially dangerous people were,” Houser said. “It definitely troubled them that they had to balance their actions against the rule of law and civil rights.”

Andrew Conte is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7835 or andrewconte@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.