Archive

ShareThis Page
Trib HSSN high school football power rankings: Week 14 | TribLIVE.com
News

Trib HSSN high school football power rankings: Week 14

482869ptrHSFBpowerrankings

Every Tuesday during the 2018 WPIAL football season, the TribLive High School Sports Network releases our weekly power rankings. These rankings have zero classification boundaries.

This is the final week of the hit sensation, where talk of classification and boundaries are not reality and the strength of the overall team is considered whether there are 71 or 17 players on the roster.

If you want reality moving forward, focus on our Trib HSSN weekly Top 5, wisely assembled each week by Chris Harlan.

However in my imaginary bubble, size does not matter.

In our final football season power rankings, we salute the 2018 WPIAL champions. None of them were perfect (well, Penn Hills is undefeated), but all of them overcame adversity to make this a golden season and they will be remembered as champions.

Here are the finals rankings heading into Week 14:

WPIAL Football Trib Ten

Team – Overall record – Last week’s ranking – Next

1. Penn Hills (14-0, 1) vs. Archbishop Wood on Friday

2. Pine-Richland (11-2, 2) vs. St. Joe’s Prep on Saturday

3. Aliquippa (12-1, 3) vs. Sharon on Saturday

4. South Fayette (12-2, 4) season over

5. Steel Valley (12-1, 6) vs. Wilmington on Friday

6. Our Lady of the Sacred Heart (12-1, 8) vs. Farrell on Friday

Out: West Allegheny, South Side Beaver

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.