Trib Tested: Buxom Full-om Lip Polish |

Trib Tested: Buxom Full-om Lip Polish

Buxom Full-On Lip Polish

The claim: For kisses that’ll keep them coming back for more, this sheer, high-shine lip polish creates the look of fuller, more voluptuous lips with a refreshing tingling sensation and gentle plumping effect. Vitamins A and E help keep lips soft, supple and protected, ensuring your smoothest moves ever. It is formulated without parabens, sulfates and phthalates. Comes in 100 shades.

Cost: $19 each, or $59 for a roulette box set of 15 minis

Where: Sephora

I‘m a big fan of shiny glosses that are long-lasting and easy to apply. Buxom lip polish delivered on both fronts, with just enough of a sticky texture. I loved the “plumping” action, as it added a nice finish without being too extreme. I found the darker colors to have just the right amount of drama, while the lighter shades were glossy with just a hint of sparkle.

— Melissa Daniels

T he name is kind of a misnomer. It’s a lip gloss, with all the good and bad things that entails. Calling it a “polish” made me hope for a dry, but shiny, effect, and that’s not this product. It transfers onto cups, straws, napkins and scarves just like other lip glosses.

Back to the good things: Buxom’s colors are great. I tried a clear gloss, a medium mauve-ish tone and a darker berry shade. All three worked with my pale skin. In the tube, the product shows glittery, but on your lips, it doesn’t make you look like a teenager.

And to continue the not-aimed-at-teens trend, instead of the fairly standard bubble gum-esque scent and flavor, Buxom went with an in-vogue hint of caramel. That’s another major plus in my book, along with the moisturizing elements.

What didn’t work for me, though, was the tingling, plumping effect. For me, the plumping never happened, but the tingling went on for hours until I wiped it off. No exaggeration. Hours. Even when I applied it over a lip balm.

— Vaunda Bonnett

B uxom lips, but a puny beauty budget. The struggle is real.

I loved the shades that I tried: Julie, a “juicy watermelon,” and Karen, a “confetti pink.” (Of course, I looked to see whether there is a shade named Jill. There is. It’s described as a “magenta tease.” Ahem!)

The gloss went on thick, but not tacky. I loved the refreshing tingling and caramel scent that accompanied every application, which I found to be less frequent than with other glosses. It survived an hour of errands and breakfast of a grande pumpkin spice latte and Frosted Confetti Cake Pop Tarts. (Don’t judge.)

My lips certainly looked more voluptuous and were soft and supple after the gloss wore off.

— Jill Leonard

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.