Trib’s Female Athlete of the Week |

Trib’s Female Athlete of the Week

Meta Haley

School: Quaker Valley

Class: Senior

Sport: Soccer

Notable: Haley scored two goals Monday in Quaker Valley’s 9-0 rout of South Allegheny to bring her team-leading point total to 19 goals and 16 assists. She has led the Class AA Quakers to an 8-1-1, 7-0 record and a No. 2 ranking behind Sewickley Academy. She scored the lone goal for the Quakers in Saturday’s 1-1 tie with Sewickley Academy.

For her effort, Haley is the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review Female Athlete of the Week. Tune into Fox Sports Net for more coverage of Haley on Pittsburgh Sports Tonight.

Multi-talented : Haley plays forward and center midfielder for the Quakers. “She has an exceptional eye for the goal and can always put the ball on net,” third-year coach Kristin Steffey said. “She has great field vision and ball distribution. She creates opportunities because of her style of play.”

Last year Haley led her team to 19-6 record before falling in the WPIAL finals in a shootout to Sewickley Academy. The Quakers went on to lose in the state quarterfinals to Fairview.

“I prefer forward because my strength is my speed,” Haley said. “But, I’ll play either position.”

Future Olympian?: Haley played on the Olympic Development Program team in the offseason. The Olympic program selects 20 of the top players in a given area for several teams around the country. Haley played on the western Pennsylvania squad.

Team player: Quaker Valley’s offense revolves around a lot of passing and moving — where Haley excels. “I think we work well as a team,” she said. “We can find each other well and connect. We practice a lot of offense and defense, and everyone’s expected to work hard and maintain a certain level.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.