Trib’s shortsighted |

Trib’s shortsighted

Your call for tough love smacks of partisan shortsightedness (“Don’t reward Murphy,” Editorial, Dec. 11).

Many Pittsburghers, both Republican and Democrat, dislike the current mayor’s policies and past decisions. Nevertheless, Pittsburgh is running out of money, leaving the city with two remedies: reducing spending and raising revenue.

These choices are not mutually exclusive, nor should they be.

Selective reductions in nonessential services coupled with a modest increase in certain taxes (like the occupational privilege tax, which, had it been adjusted for inflation, would now be approximately $49, instead of $10 annually) is the responsible solution to Pittsburgh’s financial woes.

By encouraging the Legislature in its attempt to eliminate one of Pittsburgh’s corrective opportunities to spite Mayor Tom Murphy, you hinder the recovery of your beloved city.

Thomas D. Goslin III
Silver Spring, Md.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.