ShareThis Page
Tribune-Review Male Athlete of the Week |

Tribune-Review Male Athlete of the Week

| Tuesday, November 16, 2004 12:00 a.m

Kevin Garner

School: West Mifflin

Class: Senior

Sport: Football

Position: Fullback/defensive end

Notable: Garner was a two-way standout in West Mifflin’s stunning 23-22 victory over top-seeded West Allegheny in the WPIAL Class AAA semifinals last week at North Allegheny’s Newman Stadium.

The 6-foot-2, 225-pounder rushed for 46 yards to set up the Titans’ first touchdown, recovered a fumble to set up the second score, had a big tackle on a two-point conversion and supported a pair of goal-line stands.

“He’s the type of kid who’s always hustling on the field and always in on the play,” West Mifflin coach Ray Braszo said.

Garner has charged No. 13 seed West Mifflin’s unlikely run through the WPIAL playoffs. The Titans (7-5) upset No. 4 Franklin Regional and No. 5 Canon-McMillan in the first two rounds, and topped West Allegheny for the first time. Next up is No. 2 Thomas Jefferson (10-2) in the WPIAL Class AAA finals at 4:30 p.m. on Saturday at Heinz Field. Garner, a four-year starter, as offers from Kent State, Toledo, Central Michigan and Eastern Michigan. West Mifflin lost five of its first seven games, and sneaked into the playoffs as the fourth-place team from the Big Seven Conference.

“At one point in time, we didn’t know if we were going to make the playoffs,” Garner said. “We pulled through and did it.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.