ShareThis Page
Trojans shade Cougars |

Trojans shade Cougars

California edged visiting Charleroi, 6-5, Thursday in a WPIAL playoff tuneup for both teams.

The Trojans won despite collecting only four hits off the Cougars’ Justin Deutsch and Kolton Ramsdell.

California did all its scoring in the second inning when the Trojans collected their four hits to go with two Charleroi miscues.

Andy Galis’ two-run single and Jason Britton’s two-run triple were the big hits for California after Matt Hartman and Brad Wright opened with singles before Terry Luko and Brandon Rossi both reached on errors.

Charleroi scored its first run in the third inning when Kevin Carson walked, went to second on an overthrow and came home on an error on Chris Chacko’s grounder.

Carson singled in the Cougars’ second run in the fourth inning after Zach Neil reached on an error and Ramsdell and Josh Farner drew walks to load the bases.

Doubles by Ramsdell and Deutsch around walks to Ramsdell and Carson accounted for Charleroi’s last three runs.

Chris Cox started for the Trojans before being replaced in the sixth inning by Dustin Taylor.

California will take a 14-5 record and four-game winning streak into the Class A playoffs. Charleroi enters the Class AA playoffs with a 11-6 mark.

Bentworth 5

Monessen 2

The Bearcats snapped a four-game losing skid to 3nd the season in a non-section game at Monessen.

Sophomore Derek Jansante went the distance for the Bearcats (9-10) scattering 10 hits with nine strikeouts and no walks.

Matt Yartin singled, went to second on Kory Imbrescia’s sacrifice and scored on Dave Lauteri’s single in the first inning to give Monessen a short-lived 1-0 lead.

The Bearcats tied the game with a run in the second inning and went ahead to stay with two runs in both the fifth and sixth innings.

Dan Hepple singled after Yartin doubled for Monessen’s other run in the seventh.

Nico Smolec had three singles for the Greyhounds (4-13) as did Derek Yanchak for Bentworth.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.