Trophy shot trumps learning |

Trophy shot trumps learning

Dear families of South Fayette School District:

While I believe the district is a fantastic place to send my children, I am disappointed in the early closure of the entire district on Nov. 21 for a football game.

Should the kids have gotten to play in the game? Absolutely! However, this is a school district first and foremost, not a football factory.

The idea that 2,400 children in grades kindergarten through 12, the majority of whom have no connection to the team, missed nearly three hours of academic time so 60 kids could play a game is ridiculous. Why was my child’s education less important than Johnny Football Player’s game?

Please remember that a very small minority of children play high school football, but every child comes to school to learn. We already celebrate athletic accomplishments with signs all over the area while ignoring academic achievements. Why must sports continually come first?

What about siblings who wanted to go to the game? Their parents could have decided the game was more important than school and made arrangements.

How can teachers attend staff meetings and in-service presentations stressing the importance of educational time when the administration believes a game is more important than learning? Also, every parent-teacher conference about the importance of academics will ring hollow because the administration will cancel classes at the drop of a hat if a trophy is on the line.

Mike Rowe

South Fayette

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.