Archive

ShareThis Page
Troubles plague nuclear mission | TribLIVE.com
News

Troubles plague nuclear mission

The Associated Press
| Tuesday, November 4, 2014 12:01 a.m.

WASHINGTON — The Air Force on Monday fired two more nuclear commanders and disciplined a third, fresh evidence of leadership lapses in a nuclear missile corps that has suffered a rash of recent setbacks, including the firing last year of its top commander.

The most senior officer to be relieved of command was Col. Carl Jones, the No. 2 commander of the 90th Missile Wing at F.E. Warren Air Force Base, Wyo., in charge of 150 of the Air Force’s 450 Minuteman 3 nuclear intercontinental ballistic missiles. He was dismissed “for a loss of trust and confidence in his leadership abilities” and has been reassigned.

The actions were confirmed in response to an inquiry about an Air Force investigation of two commanders at the 91st Missile Wing at Minot Air Force Base, N.D., responsible for 150 Minuteman 3 missiles.

A spokesman for Air Force Global Strike Command said missile squadron commander Lt. Col. Jimmy “Keith” Brown was relieved of command when an investigation found he engaged in “unlawful discrimination” by indicating pregnancy would hurt a woman’s career.

Also, in March, a two-person crew at a launch control center felt ill from fumes in a refurbishment project but remained at their post out of fear that Brown would take action against them if they left. They later were hospitalized.

The second officer investigated was Col. Richard Pagliuco, commander of the 91st Operations Group at Minot.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.