ShareThis Page
Turning a page on Carnegie |

Turning a page on Carnegie

| Sunday, October 11, 2009 12:00 a.m

Sorry, Mr. Carnegie, Pittsburgh can’t afford your gift anymore. This may be a first in the annals of philanthropy.

Carnegie Library of Pittsburgh announced a painful hit the other day.

It will shut down four neighborhood branches in 2010 and merge two others. That’s something like a third of the total, though not the busiest.

Thirty jobs will disappear. Systemwide hours will shrink 28 percent. And all, of course, to save on costs. Government keeps getting admonished to cut, cut. Well, here it is.

Yet as trends are running, another budget squeeze looms the year after next.

This is bad in so many ways, including (it’s not too far a stretch to say) for business. We will be less of a community that reads. It is a dumbing down in job readiness.

With all the influences that turn the minds of young people to mush nowadays — too much television, computer games, ear-blasting music — Pittsburgh will have fewer places to borrow books. Andrew Carnegie (1835-1919) wouldn’t approve.

The immigrant boy who became the world’s greatest steelmaster credited his rise, certainly his start, to literature freely loaned from the shelves of a generous neighbor. Decades later he donated 2,400 libraries, but with a shrewd Scotch condition. He’d give the buildings, the communities had to stock the stacks. And keep them circulating.

That’s what today’s Carnegie Library of Pittsburgh can’t seem to manage as in the past. It hopes to save $1.6 million, and balance a $22 million 2010 budget, by closing branches in Beechview, West End, Hazelwood and Lawrenceville, combining Carrick and Knoxville, taking other cuts, and raising fines and fees.

It’s all pretty painful. Libraries informally serve as community centers. A neighborhood value is involved.

But the economic realities are brutal. The city of Pittsburgh, itself officially distressed, gives its library system only $40,000 a year. Harrisburg’s protracted budget standoff could end up slashing 30 percent or more from libraries across the state.

The Carnegie’s lifeline is Allegheny County’s Regional Asset District, fed by a 1 percent add-on to Pennsylvania’s 6 percent sales tax. But RAD’s $17.6 million to the Carnegie Library system is frozen at last year’s level. No one in the arts world complains publicly, but RAD took on huge bond obligations to build stadiums some years back. Books, music, art, all of that, have to share what’s left.

In fairness, the libraries due to close aren’t as bustling as in the more bookish days gone by. Many patrons make a beeline for the computers and their own e-mails rather than the likes of Shakespeare, Dickens and Hemingway The busiest of the four branches circulated only about 62,400 items last year, an average of 200 or so per day.

Still, some of these landmarks date to the 1890s. The fabulous Andrew himself might have cut the ribbons. He’d tell today’s kids, “Get yourself to a library, even if it means walking farther. Look what books did for me.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.