ShareThis Page
Turnpike toll hikes a necessary evil |

Turnpike toll hikes a necessary evil

| Saturday, September 27, 2003 12:00 a.m

Normally, we’re among the last to endorse any fee or tax increase, but in the case of the Pennsylvania Turnpike, it may be justified.

Anyone who has done much driving on the state’s 530-mile turnpike system can readily understand the need for an upgrade. Parts of the road, especially in southwestern Pennsylvania, are in deplorable condition.

Even though business is good on the turnpike — collections during the past fiscal year hit a record $399.5 million from 178.3 million vehicles — turnpike officials say they can only afford to fix four miles of the road each year.

At that rate it would take more than 132 years to fix the whole thing, and we shudder to think what our local roads might look like after a century of neglect.

Making matters worse, the Turnpike Commission contends it needs to repair 640 bridges along the road that have been in place for 40 years or more. Two of the bridge projects, which span the Susquehanna and Allegheny rivers, are projected to cost at least $100 million each.

To cover these costs, the commission is likely to increase its tolls, something that hasn’t happened since 1991.

“There’s no other way but to raise tolls,” said Joe Brimmeier, executive director of the Turnpike Commission. “It may make us one of the highest toll road agencies in the East, but we’re also the oldest, with lots to do.”

Pennsylvania’s tolls of 4 cents per mile on the mainline aren’t out of line when compared to the rest of the nation. Massachusetts drivers, for instance, pay 5.5 cents per mile. Other similar averages are 4.3 cents per mile in West Virginia and 4.1 cents per mile in Oklahoma and Wyoming.

We’ll reluctantly support a toll increase, but only if all the money is guaranteed to be used to improve and maintain the roadways and to make traveling the Turnpike a little bit safer for everyone who drives through Pennsylvania.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.