Archive

ShareThis Page
TV program on killing of bin Laden rebuked by SEAL commander | TribLIVE.com
News

TV program on killing of bin Laden rebuked by SEAL commander

Tribune-Review
| Tuesday, November 4, 2014 8:42 p.m

WASHINGTON — The commander of Navy SEALs has issued a stinging rebuke to troops who have broken the elite force’s hallowed tradition of secrecy and humility by publishing memoirs and speaking to the media.

Days after the Fox News network announced it would broadcast a documentary with a commando who claims to have shot Osama bin Laden, Rear Adm. Brian Losey, the head of Naval Special Warfare Command, wrote to his troops denouncing anyone who seeks fame or fortune by revealing details of secret missions.

“A critical tenet of our Ethos is, ‘I do not advertise the nature of my work, nor seek recognition for my actions,’” Losey and the top enlisted sailor, Force Master Chief Michael Magaraci, wrote in the letter.

“We do not abide wilful or selfish disregard for our core values in return for public notoriety and financial gain, which only diminishes otherwise honorable service, courage and sacrifice,” said the letter, dated Oct. 31.

The strict code of humble anonymity represented a “life-long commitment and obligation,” and those who flouted it were no longer teammates “in good standing,” it said.

The commander warned in the letter that “we will actively seek judicial consequence for members who wilfully violate the law” by revealing classified information.

The documentary, titled “The Man Who Killed Osama Bin Laden,” is due to air this month. Fox News said it had no plans to cancel the program.

“Fox News has not been contacted by the Department of Defense or any other government agency expressing concern about ‘The Man Who Killed Osama Bin Laden’ special and we have every intention of airing it as planned on Tuesday and Wednesday,” spokesperson Carly Shanahan said.

A spokesman for San Diego-based Naval Special Warfare Command declined to comment beyond the letter.

“It is well within the prerogative of the Naval Special Warfare community leadership to communicate their thoughts on issues important to the force. The letter speaks for itself,” Cmdr. Jason Salata wrote in an e-mail to Navy Times.

The Pentagon could not confirm if the commando identified in the documentary took part in the May 2011 raid but said all troops are legally bound by nondisclosure agreements promising never to discuss classified information, even after they retire from the military.

“If in fact this individual was associated with the military unit that carried out the UBL (Osama bin Laden) raid, which is yet to be determined, he is still bound by his Non-Disclosure Agreement to not discuss classified information, especially in a nationally televised interview,” a spokesperson, Commander Amy Derrick-Frost, said in an email.

For a force known as the “quiet professionals,” the 2011 bin Laden raid thrust an intense public spotlight on the highly trained troops, with publishers and producers eager to sell their stories to a hungry audience.

Another Navy SEAL who was part of the team that carried out the May 2011 raid on Bin Laden’s Pakistani compound, Matt Bissonnette, ran into trouble by publishing a memoir without submitting it to the Pentagon for review beforehand.

The government accused him of violating his legal obligation to allow the Defense Department to check the manuscript before publication to ensure no sensitive secrets would be exposed.

Bissonnette’s lawyer has been in talks with government attorneys to try to settle the dispute, but the commando remains under criminal investigation, officials said.

Bissonnette’s book, “No Easy Day,” was a best-seller, and now he is poised to release a new memoir, “No Hero: The Evolution of a Navy SEAL.” But this time, he agreed to the Pentagon vetting the manuscript before publication.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.