ShareThis Page
Twin teens from the North Side accused in slaying |

Twin teens from the North Side accused in slaying

| Tuesday, July 10, 2007 12:00 a.m

Twin brothers from the North Side were accused by city homicide detectives Monday of fatally shooting another man, who was on his way to pick up children to take to the Pirates game, because he was from another neighborhood.

Davon and Jovon Knox, both 17, of the California-Kirkbride neighborhood, were awaiting arraignment in Night Court on a charge of criminal homicide in the fatal shooting of Jehru Donaldson, 18, of Manchester.

Donaldson was shot in the head as he sat in his car about 1:30 p.m. Sunday in the 1700 block of Brighton Place.

He died shortly after noon yesterday at Allegheny General Hospital, North Side, a spokesman for the Allegheny County Medical Examiner’s Office said.

The Knox brothers were taken into custody without incident in a home in the Central North Side by members of the U.S. Marshals Western Pennsylvania Fugitive Task Force, city homicide Detective Thomas Leheny said.

Leheny said Donaldson drove to Brighton Place to pick up the young children of his sister’s friend, then he was going to the Pirates game.

The only known motive is because Donaldson lived in another part of the North Side, Leheny said.

“He was in the wrong neighborhood. He wasn’t doing anything wrong,” Leheny said.

Detectives were told that Donaldson recently graduated from high school and was planning to go to college.

Leheny said detectives received helpful information from witnesses, which led to the quick arrest.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.