ShareThis Page
Two armed gunmen rob Regent Square tavern |

Two armed gunmen rob Regent Square tavern

| Tuesday, May 20, 2003 12:00 p.m

Two armed men bound and beat several employees of a Regent Square tavern during a Monday morning robbery, making off with an undisclosed amount of money, police said.

It was the second time in two months that masked gunmen have robbed Ryan’s Pub, and city robbery detectives said they are trying to determine whether the two heists are connected.

Pub owner Greg Sestok, 48, had four teeth knocked out during the robbery and remained hospitalized yesterday, police said. Three other employees were kicked and forced to the ground, but were uninjured.

The assailants, wearing knit caps and bandanas on their faces, entered through the rear door of the bar on South Braddock Avenue about 10:30 a.m., said robbery Detective J.R. Smith.

The men demanded money. One grabbed Sestok and forced him into an office, where he stole an undetermined amount of cash, Smith said. He then elbowed Sestok in the face and bound his mouth, hands and feet with duct tape.

The other gunman bound a second employee with duct tape and stole his wallet and cell phone. Two employees in the kitchen were ordered to lie down while the robbers took their money.

The suspects then fled in a white, boxy sedan with a black vinyl top, police said. Detectives yesterday were reviewing surveillance video from a nearby business.

Sestok previously was robbed by three masked gunmen early March 24 as he left the bar. He was not injured in that incident.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.