ShareThis Page
Two manga make the first-string cut |

Two manga make the first-string cut

| Thursday, June 7, 2007 12:00 a.m

‘My Heavenly Hockey Club’ Vol. 1 By Al Morinaga ($10.95, Del Ray, comedy for ages 13+)

Hana loves sleeping more than anything. That’s why she studied so hard to get into a top school — it’s only three minutes from her house, which means more time to sleep in. But, while sleepwalking her way through an intersection, Hana steps out in front of a car. She’s not hurt — she practically has superpowers half-asleep — but the car is beat up. Izumi, the princely leader of the field hockey team, notices her “skill,” and tricks her into joining the team or paying for car repairs. Hana reluctantly joins the motley team, which doesn’t even have enough members to actually play a match. The fantastic artwork’s details perfectly capture the characters’ emotions. Hana’s obsession with sleep and the tension between her and the eccentric Izumi scores as a romantic comedy without relying on cliches. You could call it a “sleeper” hit.

‘Gothic Sports’ Vol. 1 By Anike Hage ($9.99, Tokyopop, drama for ages 13+)

There’s something endearing about a short girl with the heart of star athlete in a body prone to clumsiness. Anya studied hard to be accepted into the prestigious Lucrece High — not for its academics, but its first-rate athletic program. Unfortunately, the girls basketball team mocks the 4’11” Anya, and the boys soccer team won’t give her a chance. But instead of warming the bench, she forms her own soccer team that’s not only open to all, but makes a fashion statement. Recruiting members is hard enough, but when the principal sends her rival’s best friend to manage the team — and a boy who dissed her in the past joins — the pressure’s on to prove they can perform. The artwork is clean and soft and sweet, and the storyline’s underdog plot is hard to resist.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.