ShareThis Page
Two receive ‘Spirit of King’ awards |

Two receive ‘Spirit of King’ awards

The Tribujne-Review
| Monday, January 15, 2001 12:00 p.m

An obstetrician and businessman who won a legal battle to live in a neighborhood where he wasn’t welcome and a journalist who became the first female editor-in-chief of a nationally circulated newspaper were winners of the 2001 ‘Spirit of King’ award.

The award in honor of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was given posthumously to Dr. Oswald Jerry Nickens and Hazel Garland.

Family members received the awards at a small ceremony last week at the Kingsley Association in East Liberty, which along with the Port Authority of Allegheny County and the Pittsburgh Pirates sponsors the award.

Nickens, who died in 1995 at the age of 73, was a Pittsburgh native who became the first black physician to join the staff at Magee-Womens Hospital in Oakland and the Western Pennsylvania Hospital in Bloomfield.

He also won a 1963 case in the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas allowing him and his wife to live in Stanton Heights, where he said developer Francis Totten refused to sell him land because he ‘did not fit in.’

Garland was born Jan. 28, 1913, in Terre Haute, Ind., and moved to western Pennsylvania in the 1920s. In 1943, she was a homemaker attending clubs at a YWCA when she volunteered to give details of a meeting to the Pittsburgh Courier.

Soon she was writing a weekly column and worked her way up through the editorial ranks, becoming editor-in-chief in 1972 and winning national newspaper honors. She worked for the Courier until her death in 1988.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.