ShareThis Page
Tyson still hanging around |

Tyson still hanging around

The Associated Press
| Tuesday, April 13, 2004 12:00 a.m

If all goes according to plan, and it rarely does when Mike Tyson is involved, the former baddest man on the planet will walk into a Phoenix gym sometime this week and begin hitting the speed bag.

Or maybe he’ll walk into a Phoenix strip club and begin hitting on the dancers instead. He’s Mike Tyson, after all, so you never really know.

Tyson is 37 now, soon to be 38, and the days when he could terrorize an opponent simply by climbing into the ring seem only a distant memory. He’s fought a total of 49 seconds in the last 22 months, and got the stuffing beat out of him by Lennox Lewis the last time he fought for the title.

Reasonable people shouldn’t care anymore.

For some reason, though, we still do.

We’re drawn to Tyson for the same reason we slow down to see an accident on the roadway, or stop to watch Phil Mickelson in the final round of a major (until Sunday, that is).

He’s bitten off ears, tried to break arms and threatened to eat children. He’s served time in prison for rape and been in more courtrooms than Judge Judy.

He’s that accident waiting to happen, ready to implode or explode at any given moment. You’re not sure what Tyson you’ll get, but you can be sure that it will somehow be entertaining.

And there’s no doubt that boxing can use somebody entertaining these days.

Not since the early 1980s has the heavyweight division been so devoid of talent and so lacking of personality. It’s filled with alphabet soup champions who can’t fight, can’t sell tickets and don’t ever fight each other.

There’s an old adage on boxing that as the heavyweights go, so goes the sport. And right now boxing is going down for the long count.

“At one point, the heavyweight champion was like being the president of the world,” John Ruiz said. “It was that big. Now, people have lost the interest.”

Don’t know who Johnny Ruiz is• He’s the guy who sleepwalked through a loss to Roy Jones Jr. last year, then somehow became the WBA heavyweight champion once again by beating another guy (Hasim Rahman) whose biggest claim to fame was he gave away $15 million by signing an ill-advised deal with Don King.

Ruiz is one heavyweight champion. Chris Byrd, a nice guy and good family man who couldn’t break the proverbial egg, is another. And the third will be decided April 24 when a Ukrainian (Vitali Klitschko) fights a South African (Corrie Sanders) to replace an Englishman (Lewis) who decided to quit while he was still ahead.

But wait. There’s another title so minor no one mentions it much, but Lamon Brewster holds it after spending most of Saturday night getting his face punched in by Wladimir Klitschko before unleashing a series of punches that proved the giants do fall harder than most.

Brewster seems like a pleasant sort who thanks all the right people (God, Don King and his wife, in that order). But he’s not going to make you forget Muhammad Ali, or remember Ruiz, for that matter.

And you’re still wondering what makes a Tyson return increasingly attractive?

“Pretty encouraging, isn’t it?” Tyson said Saturday night after surveying the tattered remnants of the once-proud division.

King thinks so. He’s spent the past year signing up anyone who weighed more than 200 pounds in hopes of controlling the heavyweight division so tightly that Tyson would have to deal with him to make any money.

So far, Tyson has resisted the temptation to sign despite being given $1 million and a new Bentley by King last summer as an inducement to get him to drop his $100 million lawsuit against King. That’s just spending money and another ride for Tyson, who has made more than $300 million in the ring but is broke.

The plan right now is for Tyson to fight some stiff in July, then another stiff in the fall before meeting unbeaten Joe Mesi, possibly in December at Madison Square Garden. Since Tyson usually never sticks to the script, though, it wouldn’t be wise to buy tickets just yet.

Meanwhile, the sorry heavyweight saga plays out this weekend at Madison Square Garden when Ruiz defends his WBA title against Fres Oquendo and Byrd fights Andrew Golota, the “Foul Pole” for the IBF title.

On paper, the two fights are so bad that you wonder how they can attach the words “heavyweight title” to them. At least Vitali Klitschko’s WBC title fight with Sanders a week later has a bit of legitimacy because it is for the linear title that Lewis vacated.

If Klitschko is not haunted by his brother’s knockout loss and wins a few more fights impressively, he still may emerge as the dominant heavyweight of his times.

Don’t hold your breath, though. Vitali wasn’t even thought of as the best fighter in his family before his stock went up by going six bloody rounds with an out-of-shape Lewis last June.

Until then, there’s Tyson. Sure, he’s a freak, and, yes, he’s well past his time.

But at least he’ll get you to watch.

More than anything, that’s something that boxing needs badly these days.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.