U.S., European law enforcement sweep into corners of ‘dark web’ |

U.S., European law enforcement sweep into corners of ‘dark web’

U.S. and European law enforcement agencies Friday announced the largest strike ever against the Internet’s thriving black markets, shutting down more than 400 sites and arresting 17 people for allegedly selling drugs, weapons and illegal services to anonymous buyers worldwide.

The sites, with names such as “Hackintosh” and “Pablo Escobar Drug Store,” were found in England, Germany, France, Bulgaria, Spain and Switzerland, among other nations, according to Europol, the European Union’s law enforcement agency.

The sweep of the crackdown marked a new level of aggressiveness and coordination by Western governments determined to police shadowy corners of the Internet. Government evidence showed the shuttered sites were offering a remarkable range of illicit goods, from cocaine to counterfeit money to explosives.

Many once thought this trade was beyond the reach of police because the sites were accessible only through Tor, a service originally created by the U.S. government that directs Internet traffic through a succession of routers to hide the identities of users and the locations of servers. The ability of investigators to unmask the alleged operators of Tor sites sent shivers through those who use the service for more legitimate purposes, such as political activists, journalists and diplomats.

Several experts suggested that Tor’s ability to protect users and the locations of servers may have been compromised on a mass scale by sophisticated technological tools used by a coalition of Western law enforcement agencies that has been targeting what’s often called “The Dark Web.”

“There are no guarantees of anonymity,” said Steve Bellovin, a Columbia University computer science professor. “It’s clear that buying ⅛illicit goods⅜ on something like Tor is not as safe as people thought a year ago.”

The strike on the Dark Web — code named “Operation Onymous,” a word meaning the opposite of anonymous — began Wednesday with the arrest of a San Francisco man, Blake Benthall, for allegedly starting an online marketplace called Silk Road 2.0. The site began operations a year ago, a month after the FBI shut down a predecessor called Silk Road. He was charged with several felonies that could lead to lifelong imprisonment.

The action spread internationally Thursday and Friday as authorities in the United States and 16 European nations shut down 410 sites that were reachable through Tor and allowed anonymous transactions, typically using virtual currencies, such as Bitcoin, that were difficult for police to track. Police seized Bitcoins worth $1 million and $224,000 worth of Euros, along with drugs, gold and silver, authorities said.

“It is a plain fact that criminals use advanced technology to commit their crimes and conceal evidence — and they hide behind international borders so they can stymie law enforcement,” said Assistant Attorney General Leslie Caldwell in a statement. “But the global law enforcement community has innovated and collaborated to disrupt these ‘dark market’ websites, no matter how sophisticated or far-flung they have become.”

“We are not ‘just’ removing these services from the open Internet; this time, we have also hit services on the Darknet using Tor where, for a long time, criminals have considered themselves beyond reach,” said Troels Oerting, head of the European Cybercrime Centre, part of Europol. “We can now show that they are neither invisible nor untouchable. The criminals can run, but they can’t hide. And our work continues.”

Tor — a name that began as an acronym for “The Onion Router” because it wrapped Internet traffic in protective layers of encryption to hide a user’s identity — was developed by the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory and is run by a nonprofit group that receives State Department funding.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.