ShareThis Page
U.S. Open players to watch |

U.S. Open players to watch

The Tribune-Review
| Tuesday, June 12, 2007 12:00 a.m

Level one

Tiger Woods: Where else should the No. 1 player in the world be?

Level two

Phil Mickelson: The big left-hander’s new swing gets put to the ultimate test.

Jim Furyk: He’s an U.S. Open champion and hits it straight.

Level three

Zach Johnson: Pretty hard to think that as well as he’s playing, he won’t be a factor at Oakmont.

Vijay Singh: He’ll need to putt much better than he normally does. His strength could be a big positive in the rough.

Retief Goosen: The quiet man has proven his skill in putting on smooth, fast surfaces. Getting to them may be his problem.

Level four

Geoff Ogilvy: The defending U.S. Open champion will be in the spotlight from the start.

Adam Scott: He’s the next great one wannabe, but is he ready to stand up to U.S. Open pressure?

Steve Stricker: One of these days, this guy is going to win a big tournament. He doesn’t hit it far, but he hits straight and has been in contention a lot this year.

Stewart Cink: Another guy who has way too much game to have not been a major championship winner.

Level five

Ernie Els: The champion the last time the U.S. Open was played here. His game is starting to improve

Davis Love III: He’s on this list because he loves traditional golf courses. He’s played Oakmont before, so his experience will help.

Luke Donald: Another player who hits it straight enough. Will his iron game be sharp enough to put the ball where it needs to be on the greens?

David Toms: The man from Louisiana has a PGA Championship title, but he hasn’t been much of a regular contender since. Could Oakmont get his attention?

Jose Maria Olazabal: A two-time Masters champion knows how to perform under pressure and played well in the Players Championship last month.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.