ShareThis Page
U.S. releases ‘forever prisoner’ from Gitmo |

U.S. releases ‘forever prisoner’ from Gitmo


The U.S. military released to Saudi Arabia last week a captive who was held at the prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, for a dozen years, was never charged with a crime but was categorized for a time as a “forever prisoner.”

A Saudi plane fetched Muhammed Zahrani, 45, on Friday, reducing the detainee population at Guantanamo to 142. Days earlier, the United States sent five other Arab captives to resettlement in Europe.

The United States disclosed the transfer of the Saudi citizen Saturday when Zahrani was back in his homeland.

The sudden spurt in transfers — Zahrani was the 13th released this year — has unsettled some in Congress as the Pentagon works toward President Obama’s goal of closing the prison.

“What the Obama administration is doing is dangerous and, frankly, reckless,” the chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, Rep. Howard “Buck” McKeon, R-Calif., said after the Thursday transfer.

“If just one U.S. soldier loses their life over these transfers, we will have failed in our duty to the American people,” McKeon said. “Until we can assure the terrorists stay off the battlefield, they must stay behind bars.”

Obama has called Guantanamo a recruitment tool for extremists, damaging to international standing, unnecessary for national security as well as expensive and inefficient.

Zahrani got to Guantanamo on Aug. 5, 2002, and had been held as an indefinite detainee — meaning he was never accused of engaging in war crimes or terrorism but a 2010 federal task force declared him too dangerous to leave the prison. He was considered to be a follower of Osama bin Laden and devoted to al-Qaida.

On Oct. 3, a national security parole board downgraded the threat he posed and endorsed his repatriation, citing his “candor with the board about his presence on the battlefield, expressions of regret and desires for a peaceful life after Guantanamo.”

It is not known what he told the board during his May video conference between Guantanamo and Washington because, at Zahrani’s request, his remarks were under seal.

Two U.S. military officers who were assigned as his advocates said that, based on an intelligence estimate of Zahrani’s danger to others, he was less of a threat on paper than five Taliban prisoners sent to Qatar in May in exchange for the release of Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl, an Afghan war prisoner.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.