ShareThis Page
Westmoreland drug court participants pitch in at animal shelter |
General News

Westmoreland drug court participants pitch in at animal shelter

| Sunday, June 4, 2017 5:12 p.m

There was no dog-walking or cat-petting. Instead, it was hours of moving heavy stones and working up a sweat for about 15 people who volunteered Sunday for a less desirable job at the Humane Society of Westmoreland County.

Not everyone had landscaping experience, but they did have one thing in common: They are all part of the county’s drug court program.

“It’s nice to give back,” said Kelly Carasella of New Stanton. “It’s nice to have people you’re around that aren’t using and (who are) sober.”

About 12 program participants and a few county workers lugged 5 tons of donated stone into place on a hillside outside the cat facility, painted a porch, pulled weeds and washed puppies that had just been dropped off with their mother at the Hempfield shelter. It was an optional volunteer day for program participants, but facilitators said they hope to make it an annual event.

“It looks a lot better than it did,” shelter director Kathy Burkley said. “That was hard work.”

The county’s drug court began in September 2015 as an alternative system for up to 50 participants who must complete rigorous treatment and rehabilitative options. In return, their criminal cases could be resolved with no jail time and, in some instances, with charges dismissed altogether. The strict program lasts a minimum of 18 months.

Three participants are set to be the first graduating class on June 15. There currently are 46 participants in drug court and a waiting list of 16 more.

Chris Andring of New Kensington will be among those graduates — the day after he takes a test to become a certified recovery specialist. He coordinated Sunday’s volunteer event.

“It puts structure into your life because they make you do so many things,” Andring, 44, said of drug court. “I thought it would be just another program, but it saves a lot of people because of the structure. It’s not like any of the other programs.”

Rich Gregory of Jeannette and Josh Rimmel of Vandergrift loaded up the last few buckets of stones Sunday afternoon before taking a group photo with probation officers and county detective who have become like friends.

“What they’ve given me, I just kind of want to give back to them,” Rimmel, 35, said. “Ultimately, it is us doing the work, but they’re there to support us.”

It was the first time volunteering in the county for Rimmel and Gregory. They’ve both been in drug court for about a year and hope to graduate later this year.

“It just gives me another chance at life, a better chance at life,” Gregory, 34, said. “It gave me the chance to stay clean.”

Participants submit journal entries to either Judge Meagan Bilik-DeFazio or Judge Christopher Feliciani and can earn incentives for good behavior. Sanctions such as jail, community service and other punishments are imposed for failed drug tests and other violations. Major violations result in expulsion from the program.

“We look for everybody to become productive, of course, help them find another way other than using drugs,” said Eric Leydig, a county probation officer and drug court coordinator, adding that the volunteer day helped participants to “become more pro-social without negative consequences.”

Renatta Signorini is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 724-837-5374, or via Twitter @byrenatta.

Categories: General News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.