ShareThis Page
Underdog Kiski Area gives all, falls to Hampton in 1st round |

Underdog Kiski Area gives all, falls to Hampton in 1st round

Michael Love
| Tuesday, February 21, 2017 11:03 p.m
Louis B. Ruediger | Tribune-Review
Kiski Area's Jon Bracy drives toward the basket as Hampton's Nick Schuit and Kyle Reese attempt to defend during the first round of the WPIAL Class 5A playoffs Tuesday, Feb. 21, 2017, at Fox Chapel High School.
Louis B. Ruediger | Tribune-Review
Kiski Area's Kyle Harris shoots for two as Hampton's Kyle Reese attempts to defend during the first round of the WPIAL 5A playoffs Tuesday, Feb. 21, 2017, at Fox Chapel High School.
Louis B. Ruediger | Tribune-Review
Hampton's Nick Schuit scores two with a steal from Kiski Area during the first round of the WPIAL 5A playoffs Tuesday, Feb. 21, 2017, at Fox Chapel High School.
Louis B. Ruediger | Tribune-Review
Hampton coach Joe Lafko signals his players during the first round of the WPIAL 5A playoffs Tuesday, Feb. 21, 2017, at Fox Chapel High School.
Louis B. Ruediger | Tribune-Review
Kiski Area's Ryne Wallace attempts to drive around Hampton's Nick Schuit during the first round of the WPIAL 5A playoffs Tuesday, Feb. 21, 2017, at Fox Chapel High School.

As the No. 12 seed, Kiski Area was the underdog for its WPIAL 5A first-round game against No. 5 Hampton on Tuesday at Fox Chapel.

The Cavaliers took a quick 6-0 lead and were able to stay with the Talbots for a while, but Hampton turned away every Kiski Area charge and came away with a 60-44 victory.

“My message to them was to give me 110 percent effort and leave it all on the court,” Kiski Area coach Joey Tutchstone said.

“At the end of the day, whatever we did out there, good or bad, I wanted them to look me in the eye and say they gave me that effort. And they did that. We just fell a little short.”

Kiski hoped to turn around its fortunes after a four-game losing streak to end the regular season. The Cavaliers finished their season at 10-11 overall.

Hampton, the fourth-place team out of Section 2, improved to 14-9 and advances to the quarterfinals Friday against No. 4 McKeesport at a site and time to be determined.

“Give those Kiski kids credit. They’re physical and strong. They are a deserving playoff team,” Hampton head coach Joe Lafko said. “They defended us well. But we were able to make some plays as well, attacking off the dribble to create some space.”

Kiski jumped out to its early lead on 3-pointers from seniors Connor Martin and Nicholas Bisceglia. Six turnovers in the game’s first five minutes, however, prevented the Cavaliers from extending that advanatage.

Hampton used a 14-4 run the rest of the quarter to lead 14-10 after eight minutes.

Antonio Ionadi, the Talbots’ leading scorer, tallied 13 of his game-high 20 in the first half as Hampton doubled that lead to eight at the break.

Kiski had a pair of chances to reduce the deficit to a possession in the third quarter but failed to score on both occasions. “We forced two bad shots instead of running something and executing,” Tutchstone said. “That killed us.”

The Cavaliers also were hampered, Tutchstone said, when Martin and fellow starter Kyle Harris both left the game with their fourth fouls a minute apart midway through the third quarter.

Kiski had it as close as 37-32 with 4 minutes, 41 seconds remaining in the quarter before Hampton started to pull away.

The Talbots led 42-35 with 2:40 to play in the period before concluding the frame on an 8-0 run.

In addition to Ionadi’s big game, Nick Schuit came off the bench to score 11 for Hampton. Isaac DeGregorio also didn’t start, but he too ended the game scoring in double-figure with 10 points.

“The first one always is a toughest,” Lafko said. “We’ll take it and move on.”

Sophomore Ryne Wallace scored a team-best 13 in a reserve role for the Cavaliers.

Playing in their final varsity games, Harris and senior Jon Bracy tallied 11 and 10 points, respectively.

“I am proud of the guys,” Tutchstone said. “I couldn’t ask anything more from them. No one expected us to make the playoffs, but the guys did, and they gave themselves a chance against a really good Hampton team. We were here, and we fought and battled.”

Michael Love is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at or via Twitter @Mlove_Trib.

Michael Love is a Tribune-Review sports reporter. You can contact Michael at 412-856-7400 x8632, or via Twitter .

Categories: News
Tags: |
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.