ShareThis Page
Union boss pay: Drip, drip, drip |

Union boss pay: Drip, drip, drip

| Wednesday, July 26, 2006 12:00 a.m

After the Trib published the names of 65 local labor union officials who, excluding benefits, receive annual compensation exceeding $100,000 — including one raking in about $208,000 — a gentle breeze, rustling leaves and a lonely cricket should not have been the only sounds.

Especially since union workers in blue-collar jobs average $12.61 per hour in the Pittsburgh area, slightly more than $26,000 annually with regular work.

Readers learned that overpaid union bosses are as adept at rationalizing as overpaid corporate executives. The only difference being that no one dares to suggest union bosses are little more than greedy swine.

When a failed corporate executive receives an outrageous sweetheart compensation package — and alas there is more than one CEO in this region who, by advancing to the level of his incompetence, qualifies as a poster boy for the Peter Principle — he and the corporation board are rightly criticized.

One of the perpetual arguments offered by today’s “progressives” (yesterday’s liberals) is that there should be a supposedly reasonable ratio tying executive pay to that of the working stiffs.

And yet when a liberal has the opportunity to criticize labor greed the way he does corporate greed, the only sound that comes from his mouth is the drip, drip, drip of blood whenever he bites his tongue.

Why is this?

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.