ShareThis Page
Union: Weirton Steel no longer for sale |

Union: Weirton Steel no longer for sale

C.M. Mortimer
| Tuesday, March 6, 2007 12:00 a.m

Weirton Steel will remain a component of Mittal Steel USA, and is no longer for sale, the leader of the Independent Steelworkers Union, which represents 1,250 members at the West Virginia plant, said Tuesday.

Mittal Steel also wants to make Weirton the “premiere” producer of tinplate in the United States, said Mark Glyptis, president of the Independent Steelworkers Union. He said union leaders were encouraged and optimistic following a meeting with senior Mittal USA officials in Chicago on Monday.

Glyptis said in a statement today that the Weirton steel operations will remain “status quo,” with a mutual agreement to look for ways to improve the performance of the steel mill.

“The future of Weirton is in the hands of the employees … and we are prepared to lead the way in making Weirton a stronger partner with the Mittal corporation,” Glyptis said. “Weirton is no longer for sale. We will remain part of Mittal Steel USA,” he said.

Last month, the U.S. Department of Justice said Mittal Steel must sell its Sparrows Point tin mill plant near Baltimore, instead of the Weirton mill to settle antitrust issues over the pending merger with Arcelor SA. The decision clouded the fate of the former Weirton Steel Corp.

The government said selling the mill near Baltimore was the best way to prevent a monopoly in the eastern U.S. market for tin-plated steel.

In January, Esmark Inc., a Chicago-based steel services company, signed a letter-of-intent with Mittal to buy parts of Weirton Steel, particularly its finishing facilities. The government’s decision caused Mittal and Esmark to back off those plans.

The independent union at Weirton wanted their mill to be sold, instead of Sparrows Point, saying that it hadfailed to thrive under Mittal’s ownership.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.