ShareThis Page
Uniontown man pleads guilty for role in father’s murder |

Uniontown man pleads guilty for role in father’s murder

| Tuesday, November 6, 2001 12:00 a.m

A Fayette County man accused of taking part in the killing of his own father agreed to plead guilty after cooperating with police against the man who fired the shots.

Robert D. Cumberland Jr., 20, of 118 Pittsburgh St., Uniontown, allowed Daniel B. Manchas III to use his gun in a drive-by shooting at a home on Banning Road in Perry Township, according to investigators.

George Simon, who lived in the mobile home, had shorted Manchas in a deal to buy a small amount of crack cocaine, police said.

In the drive-by, Robert Cumberland Sr., a friend of Simon, was struck in the head by a single shot fired by Manchas.

Manchas was convicted of first-degree murder with the cooperation of the victim’s son.

“Mr. Cumberland was the key witness in the case,” Assistant District Attorney Phyllis Jin told Fayette County President Judge Gerald R. Solomon.

Cumberland pleaded guilty to criminal conspiracy to commit third-degree murder in exchange for a six- to 12-year sentence. However, he said he had no intention of killing anyone.

Cumberland told Franks he believed Manchas was going to shoot Simon’s dogs in an effort to scare him.

Cumberland will be sentenced by Franks within 90 days.

is a former freelancer.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.