Uniontown to seek $89,000 from school district |

Uniontown to seek $89,000 from school district

Uniontown City Council on Wednesday directed its solicitor, J.W. Eddy, to find out why the Uniontown School District has not paid $89,000 in sewage tap-in fees owed for its $50 million construction/renovation project.

“The Uniontown school board owes us $89,000 for sewerage tap-in fees at the high school and Lafayette School,” said Councilman Blair Jones. “We pay our bills. I don’t understand why the school district isn’t paying its bills.”

Eddy asked council members what kind of action they wanted him to take to resolve the issue. He suggested that the city could place a municipal lien on the school district for the money or he could contact the school district’s solicitor, Michael Brungo, to try to resolve the issue.

“That’s almost $90,000 that the school district owes us. We shouldn’t just forget about it,” Jones said. “We’ve also had trouble with the school district about the Dumpsters they have had during the construction. We’ve got to do something up there.”

Mayor Ed Fike said he recently met with school district officials about the sewage tap-in fees, and they indicated they were aware that the district owed the city money.

Council members said they are hoping solicitors for the city and the school district can meet in an effort to reach an agreement about the tap-in fees.

In other business, Fike commended Mark Yauger, executive director of the Uniontown Redevelopment Authority, for the work he has done on Maple Street in the Gallatin Avenue area, where 10 new 1,800-square-foot homes will be built.

“We built 30 homes in the city of Uniontown in 2009,” Fike said. “These are homes that people can physically buy. The city is moving forward at a great pace thanks to all of the people involved in the project.”

Yauger said he isn’t the only one in the city who is responsible for making the project a success.

“The people in the city should be very proud of the progress that we have been making,” Yauger said. “We’re had a lot of support from the mayor and the city’s street department. Everyone who is working for the city is committed to making it better. It’s just great to be a part of it. It’s a team effort.”

Yauger said Uniontown was one of two cities in the state selected to receive grant funding to build homes. The first grant for $1.8 million was awarded, followed by $600,000 in additional funding.

“Masontown Borough is also building homes with the $600,000 grant,” Fike said. “When Masontown completes a home and sells it, that money will come back to Uniontown, so we can build additional homes. It’s stimulus money that we were awarded.”

Fike said city officials are also very pleased about the construction of 36 senior citizens’ units on Gallatin Avenue, where the American Legion was previously located. He estimated the cost of the project at $7.5 million.

“We’re taking the land and turning it into a tax base,” he said. “It’s very good to see some progress in Uniontown.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.