ShareThis Page
United brings back experienced squad |

United brings back experienced squad

| Sunday, August 26, 2007 12:00 a.m

A season ago, United coach Chris Matava entered training camp with only four returning starters and finished with a 3-6 record.

This season, 14 starters return, along with a newly installed offense, giving Matava and his teams reason for hope.

“The experience we return should go a long way in helping our chances this season,” Matava said.

Helping the Lions convert to a new spread offense will be five returning starters, including four skill players. Senior running back Eric Skedel returns, along with junior quarterback Ernie Vogel, and junior wide receivers Justin Ruffner and Aaron Knapic.

“We feel the spread offense gives us the best chance to utilize our athletes’ strengths,” Matava said.

Defensively, United returns nine starters, including five linebackers, led by senior inside linebacker Kevin Cassatt. Junior Tim Rash returns at outside linebacker, along with two-way starters Vogel and Skedel. Ruffner and Knapic anchor the secondary.

Despite struggling in 2006, United is only two seasons removed from a 7-3 finish and a berth in PIAA District 6 playoffs. In his 10th season at United, Matava understands the balance and parity that exists in the Heritage Conference.

“I feel as though the conference will have more equal teams than ever before,” said Matava, a former United quarterback. “We must prepare the same and be ready to play every game.”

Additional Information:

United Lions

Conference: Heritage Conference, District 6

Coach: Chris Matava

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.