Archive

ShareThis Page
United Mine Workers responds to strike complaint | TribLIVE.com
News

United Mine Workers responds to strike complaint

The Associated Press
| Tuesday, November 25, 2014 10:45 p.m

MORGANTOWN, W.Va. — A Patriot Coal subsidiary used contract workers who violated safety standards at a Marion County mine, endangering union workers, according to court documents the union filed in a dispute with the company.

The subsidiary, Eastern Associated Coal, sued after union workers walked off the job Oct. 17 at the Federal No. 2 mine about 25 miles west of Morgantown. A federal judge ordered the union workers back the mine later that same day.

The union complaint said “there have been numerous safety violations committed by contractors” that “have deprived bargaining unit employees of a safe workplace and resulted in them having a reasonable concern for their safety and well-being.”

Using contract workers instead of union workers violates an agreement between Local 1570 and Eastern, according to the complaint.

The allegations were filed by the United Mine Workers of America Local No. 1570 on Monday.

The complaint said grievances were filed with Eastern in December 2013 and this spring but “there have been numerous violations of the settlement agreements.”

Monday’s complaint asked for Eastern to stop using contractors, and to award damages to Local 1570 for lost work opportunities.

The initial lawsuit by Eastern followed a brief strike that ended when Chief U.S. Judge John Preston Bailey granted a temporary restraining order, sending workers back on the job.

The order was set to expire on Nov. 14. A preliminary injunction hearing set for that day was cancelled.

Eastern has not responded to the union’s latest filing.

Phil Smith, of the UMW, says the Federal No. 2 mine employs more than 300 workers.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.