ShareThis Page
United States world leader in mine safety, expert says |

United States world leader in mine safety, expert says

The Associated Press
| Tuesday, August 13, 2002 12:00 a.m

PHILADELPHIA (AP) — Just days before a group of Pennsylvania miners were trapped in a flooded shaft for three days, nine miners in China survived a similar ordeal.

While the rescue here inspired the nation, the survival of the Chinese after eight days underground was even more of a rarity.

China produces slightly more coal than the United States, but has many times the fatalities due to inferior safety practices. Mine disasters are also common in the Ukraine, where 20 miners died in an accident three days before the Pennsylvania rescue.

China and the Ukraine are still trying to implement safety techniques in use in the United States for more than three decades, including strict ventilation, roof-support and training requirements, a Penn State mine safety expert said.

“Health and safety regulations passed at the federal level in 1969 really revolutionized several aspects of underground coal mining in the United States,” said Raja Romney, a professor emeritus of mining engineering.

The Quecreek accident that trapped the nine miners near Somerset was blamed on a mapping problem that led the crew to breach an adjacent, water-filled abandoned mine they thought was 300 feet away. Problems behind the rash of mining disasters in China and Ukraine are more basic.

China is the world’s largest coal producer, churning out 1.5 billion tons a year for its own power plants and industries and for export to Japan, which closed its last coal mine in January.

But China’s mines often lack such basic equipment as ventilation gear and explosions are frequent.

According to China’s state Coal Mine Safety Supervision Bureau, more than 3,500 miners have been killed in gas explosions, floods and other mining accidents this year; 5,798 died last year. The industry’s death rate per million tons mined is more than 100 times that in the United States and 20 times the worldwide rate.

Many deaths may go unreported. State media and Chinese government officials reported the recovery of 18 bodies in May from a mine whose owner hid the body of one dead miner, destroyed employee records and used paint to conceal burn marks at the mine entrance.

In contrast, the United States, second in world production at 1.1 billion tons, had 43 fatalities last year and 17 though July 11, the U.S. Mine Safety and Health Administration said.

Ukraine’s mines produce about a tenth as much coal — 109 million tons — but have one of the highest accident rates, blamed on poor maintenance and neglected safety since subsidies ended with the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991.

Romney, who has visited underground coal mines worldwide, said many Chinese and Ukrainian mines are at far greater depths than Quecreek, and have thin, steeply sloping seams that produce more methane and multiply the engineering challenges.

Romney is on a commission Gov. Mark Schweiker named to examine mine safety and recommend changes to prevent a recurrence of the Quecreek accident. But overall, he applauded mine safety in the United States.

“The high productivity rates we are able to achieve have really helped ensure that not as many miners are exposed,” Romney said.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.