ShareThis Page
University of Pittsburgh to replace 3,000 diplomas lost in flooding |

University of Pittsburgh to replace 3,000 diplomas lost in flooding

| Tuesday, June 23, 2009 12:00 a.m

The University of Pittsburgh lost more than 3,000 diplomas in last week’s flood.

Stored on the ground floor of Thackeray Hall, the diplomas for April graduates were awaiting delivery when Wednesday night’s flood destroyed them. Official diplomas are not presented at graduation.

“I was wondering where my diploma was,” said Marianne Vu, 23, who earned degrees in neuroscience and psychology. “I think it’s crazy that they didn’t notify us in any way about it.”

A number of buildings on campus suffered “major” flood damage, according to a statement from the registrar’s office.

Delivery of the diplomas will be delayed about 10 days, university spokesman John Fedele said. Pitt officials are double-checking name spellings so they can rush-order new diplomas and have them in the mail by July 2, he added.

“(It’s) bizarre. … It’s an act of nature. We’re just lucky it hasn’t happened before,” Fedele said.

He declined to reveal the financial loss to the university. Pitt’s facilities director could not be reached for comment on whether the loss will be covered by insurance.

Printing and rush-ordering that many diplomas could cost $9,000 to $21,000, according to the Utah-based Michael Sutter Co., which is not working with Pitt.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.