ShareThis Page
University of Virginia reinstates Phi Kappa Psi fraternity linked by Rolling Stone to rape |

University of Virginia reinstates Phi Kappa Psi fraternity linked by Rolling Stone to rape

| Tuesday, January 13, 2015 12:01 a.m

CHARLOTTESVILLE β€” The University of Virginia’s Phi Kappa Psi chapter, which was embroiled in sexual assault allegations stemming from a Rolling Stone magazine article, has been reinstated on campus, fraternity officials, police and school administrators said Monday.

Phi Psi officials said that UVa President Teresa A. Sullivan approved the full reinstatement of the fraternity chapter after new developments in a police investigation of sexual assault claims described in Rolling Stone.

The magazine has apologized since a Washington Post investigation discovered significant inconsistencies in the account of a junior named Jackie who said she was gang-raped at Phi Psi in 2012.

On Monday, university officials said the Charlottesville police investigation concluded that allegations against Phi Psi detailed in the Rolling Stone story could not be substantiated.

β€œWe welcome Phi Kappa Psi, and we look forward to working with all fraternities and sororities in enhancing and promoting a safe environment for all,” Sullivan said in a statement.

Charlottesville police Capt. Gary Pleasants said that while Phi Psi has been cleared, the investigation into the allegations is ongoing.

β€œWe’re still investigating,” Pleasants said. β€œWe found no basis to believe that an incident occurred at that fraternity, so there’s no reason to keep them suspended.”

As a result of the Rolling Stone article’s publication online in November, the Phi Kappa Psi house was vandalized and the fraternity voluntarily suspended its charter at the university as police investigated the allegations. In December, the fraternity issued a statement denying the claims described in Rolling Stone and noted that its own inquiry into the allegations revealed factual inaccuracies.

β€œWe are pleased that the University and the Charlottesville Police Department have cleared our fraternity of any involvement in this case,” said Phi Psi chapter President Stephen Scipione, a junior. β€œIn today’s 24-hour news cycle, we all have a tendency to rush to judgment without having all of the facts in front of us. As a result, our fraternity was vandalized, our members ostracized based on false information.”

Last week, Sullivan announced a new contract between the university and fraternities that included enhanced safety measures for social activities designed to discourage binge drinking.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.