ShareThis Page
Unlocking autism |

Unlocking autism

| Wednesday, July 23, 2008 12:00 a.m

We’re proud that Pennsylvania’s new autism law will put our state at the forefront of helping parents deal with this puzzling neurological disease.

The law requires health insurance companies to cover $36,000 a year in behavior therapy for children up to age 21, beginning next year. Insurance companies traditionally have denied services saying they are not “medically necessary.”

But many autistic children need intensive therapy to unlock their potential. Children can have a wide variety of symptoms but many have difficulty in communicating and relating to others. And that means some need aides to attend regular classrooms in school.

Medical experts don’t agree on what causes autism. But there’s been an alarming increase in recent years, with about 1 in every 150 children now affected.

A Harvard study released two weeks ago provided important clues. It found that some genes in autistic children seem to be turned off, which may explain why many children respond to intensive therapy started at a young age — because it may activate those genes.

This law has been a long battle — and many Valley families have lobbied for it, as we’ve reported in recent years.

The bill was sponsored by Sen. Jane Orie, who represents part of the Valley, and House Speaker Dennis O’Brien, who has an autistic child in his family. State Rep. John Pallone of New Kensington has been a strong supporter as well.

A key turning point for the bill came when the Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council said the mandate would increase health care premiums statewide by only $1 a month.

That seems a small price to pay to help open doors for these children to a better future.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.