ShareThis Page
Unpaid state workers hit snag with labor complaint |

Unpaid state workers hit snag with labor complaint

| Friday, July 31, 2009 12:00 a.m

About 30 unpaid state employees who tried to file a complaint with the Department of Labor were stopped at the lobby of the Federal Building on Liberty Avenue today.

Building guards sent them back outside, until a Labor Department representative agreed to allow them to come to the office two at a time, to file complaints.

The state budget impasse is in its 31st day today, the longest impasse since 1991.

About 77,000 state workers have received partial pay, and 33,000 of them today were the first to receive no paychecks.

Sandra Downer, who has worked for the Department of Public Welfare for two years, said some state employees are taking out credit union loans to get by.

“We don’t know how long our loans are going to last. They can turn us off at any time,” said Downer, who described the budget impasse as “a nightmare.”

Senate Republican leaders and Democratic Gov. Ed Rendell have been sharply divided over taxes and spending as they try to close a $3.2 billion deficit. Negotiators remain far apart.

Rendell has pushed for a 16 percent hike in the state income tax and increased spending, including $400 million more for basic education. But House Democrats have been unable to garner enough support to bring up a tax bill. Republicans insist the state should not spend more than it takes in.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.