ShareThis Page
Unsolved: James Scott Swoyer, 23 |

Unsolved: James Scott Swoyer, 23

| Sunday, October 2, 2005 12:00 a.m

James Scott Swoyer needed a night job that paid more than minimum wage to support himself while he attended Westmoreland County Community College.

Swoyer, 23, of Jeannette, was studying to be a lab technician, said his brother, Jay Swoyer.

Swoyer earned $5 an hour as a clerk at the adult bookstore along Route 22 in Murrysville.

On the morning of Nov. 25, 1992, police were summoned to the store by the manager, who reported he was locked out of the business, which stayed open 24 hours.

Police broke through the glass door. Swoyer’s body was found behind the counter.

He had been shot four times and had a knife wound.

The killer left behind Swoyer’s wallet and his Pontiac Firebird, parked outside. There was $80 in the cash register.

“James wasn’t really that outgoing. Geez, he didn’t even tell me really where he worked,” said Jay Swoyer. “He told me he had taken a night job at a bookstore to help with his college expenses. I asked him whether it was a Christian bookstore … and the way he answered I knew something was odd.”

James Swoyer told his sister, Joy, he didn’t like dealing with the clientele, but the hours fit his class schedule, Jay Swoyer said.

The family has been tormented by the brutal death and the killer who got away with it, he said.

Additional Information:


James Scott Swoyer

Murrysville police: 724-327-2111

Westmoreland County detectives: 724-830-3287.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.