ShareThis Page
US Airways to furlough 52 more pilots |

US Airways to furlough 52 more pilots

| Saturday, April 12, 2003 12:00 a.m

US Airways intends to lay off another 52 pilots in June, including as many as 20 from its base in Pittsburgh, the pilots union said Friday.

The Air Line Pilots Association said it would file a grievance, arguing the targeted jobs are protected under a productivity agreement with US Airways that union leaders ratified in December.

“They just don’t have it in them to live up to our agreements,” said union spokesman Roy Freundlich. “There is no reason to be furloughing pilots at this time.”

The airline has 1,827 pilots on furlough, including 600 based in Pittsburgh. Yesterday’s layoff is effective June 4.

US Airways spokesman David Castelveter said the furloughs originally were to have taken place in March or this month but were deferred during months of negotiations over the pilots’ pensions. The talks produced a defined-contribution plan, effective April 1, which pays a lump-sum annuity upon a pilot’s retirement.

US Airways exited bankruptcy March 31 after less than seven months of operating under protection from creditors. With passenger traffic depressed since September 2001, the carrier has cut its payroll by 3,900 locally and reduced annual overhead by roughly $1.9 billion systemwide.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.